> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Michael R wrote:
> >Summary: Venture capitalists have heavily invested in patent ownership
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:45:19AM -0700, Rich Shepard wrote:
> Which is why some folks have tried to push patents back to things and not
Reply on plug-talk, please. This is only
Yup. That did the trick. I was getting hung up on trying to remove the
need for the Makefile.a and Makefile.b instead of just making their use
transparent.
-Thanks,
-Mike
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Mike Cherba wrote:
> Thanks Bob. I was thinking about trying something
Thanks Bob. I was thinking about trying something similar but hadn't gotten
around to it yet. I'll give that a shot.
-Mike
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Bob Miller wrote:
> mytargeta:
>$(MAKE) -f Makefile.a mytarget
>
> mytargetb:
>$(MAKE) -f Makefile.b mytarget
>
Mike Cherba wrote:
> I've got a make question I'm hoping someone can help me with.
>
> I have three Makefiles
>
> Makefile.a
> Makefile.b
> and Makefile
>
> Makefile contains all the real targets and the .a and .b files simply export
> a couple of variables and include Makefile. I want to elimi
I've got a make question I'm hoping someone can help me with.
I have three Makefiles
Makefile.a
Makefile.b
and Makefile
Makefile contains all the real targets and the .a and .b files simply export
a couple of variables and include Makefile. I want to eliminate Makefile.a
and Makefile.b by perfo
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Michael R wrote:
> The USPTO didn't allow them to be patented until the court system
> insisted. Some saw the potential for profit and successfully sued the
> patent office into granting software and business process patents.
Oh. No further comments necessary.
Rich
__
Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Michael R wrote:
>
>> Summary: Venture capitalists have heavily invested in
patent ownership
>> companies that extort payment for patents they
control. Scary because the
>> USPO has issued thousands of patents
for software ideas. As in "online
>> backu
Sorry if i gave the impression i was withholding info based on suspicions of
nefarious purposes. I've seen enough of wes' posts on here to know better, but
was honestly baffled about what legitimate purpose could be served by knowing
more about a dns update than "72 hrs for delegation changes, 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 10:07:03 -0700 nathan w wrote:
>
> Why? This query reminds me of an article i read describing the
> process of dns poisoning by pushing "updates" to a dns server at the
> moment it updates... So again... Why do you want this?
>
>>
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, wes wrote:
> thanks for doing all my work for me :)
The work was done long ago; I too have occasion to check for updates
on DNS servers I don't control. :-)
--
Paul Heinlein <> heinl...@madboa.com <> http://www.madboa.com/
___
PL
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, wes wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know of a tool that can monitor DNS replies and notify on
> > success/failure?
> >
> > Basically, I want to find out the moment a DNS server (that I do not
> > control) has updated.
>
> Assu
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, wes wrote:
> Does anyone know of a tool that can monitor DNS replies and notify on
> success/failure?
>
> Basically, I want to find out the moment a DNS server (that I do not
> control) has updated.
Assuming the DNS server in question has an IPv4 address of 12.13.14.15
and t
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Michael R wrote:
> Summary: Venture capitalists have heavily invested in patent ownership
> companies that extort payment for patents they control. Scary because the
> USPO has issued thousands of patents for software ideas. As in "online
> backup" is covered by over 3,000 pat
Hello there,
: I have a customer that is waiting on a DNS update for his site to
: start working. He's bugging my guys constantly, so I promised him
: we'd call him the moment it "works." Currently, I'm checking his
: DNS server every few minutes manually. If I could automate this
: to a
wes wrote:
> I have a customer that is waiting on a DNS update for his site to start
> working. He's bugging my guys constantly, so I promised him we'd call him
> the moment it "works." Currently, I'm checking his DNS server every few
> minutes manually. If I could automate this to alert me when it
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Michael R wrote:
>
>
>
> wes wrote:
> > I have a customer that is waiting on a DNS update
> for his site to start
> > working. He's bugging my guys constantly, so I
> promised him we'd call him
> > the moment it "works."
> Currently, I'm checking his DNS server e
Galen Seitz wrote:
> Keith Lofstrom wrote:
>> On Wed,
Jul 20, 2011 at 02:40:15PM -0700, Galen Seitz wrote:
>>> THIS
AMERICAN LIFE: The Patent Show
>>> Sun, July 24, 10am. Why would
a company rent an office in a tiny town
>>> in East Texas, put a
nameplate on the door ... and then leave it
>>> co
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 08:43, wes wrote:
> Does anyone know of a tool that can monitor DNS replies and notify on
> success/failure?
Nagios includes the tools you need here. You could either use the
whole stack (which I would recommend anyway, if you have this sort of
client issue), or just use
wes wrote:
> I have a customer that is waiting on a DNS update
for his site to start
> working. He's bugging my guys constantly, so I
promised him we'd call him
> the moment it "works."
Currently, I'm checking his DNS server every few
> minutes manually.
If I could automate this to alert me when
I have a customer that is waiting on a DNS update for his site to start
working. He's bugging my guys constantly, so I promised him we'd call him
the moment it "works." Currently, I'm checking his DNS server every few
minutes manually. If I could automate this to alert me when it's updated, we
coul
Why? This query reminds me of an article i read describing the process of dns
poisoning by pushing "updates" to a dns server at the moment it updates... So
again... Why do you want this?
- Reply message -
From: "wes"
To: "General Linux/UNIX discussion and help,civil and on-topic"
Does anyone know of a tool that can monitor DNS replies and notify on
success/failure?
Basically, I want to find out the moment a DNS server (that I do not
control) has updated.
thanks,
-wes
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdx
I have never seen this disown thing before - tried to man it and then
found it's a bash builtin. I've been shell scripting for ages and
today I learned something new and very useful, Thank you!
On 26 July 2011 16:03, Sean Ellefson wrote:
> You could try running the X program with nohup, or do s
You could try running the X program with nohup, or do something like:
$> evolution & disown
that should start the process without using your shell as the parent.
--
Sean
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/
Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 02:40:15PM -0700, Galen Seitz wrote:
>> THIS AMERICAN LIFE: The Patent Show
>> Sun, July 24, 10am. Why would a company rent an office in a tiny town
>> in East Texas, put a nameplate on the door ... and then leave it
>> completely empty for a year?
25 matches
Mail list logo
