If you do, get the options right: include '--partial' or rsync will
*delete* the incomplete file, not retain or resume it.
Daniel
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:16, Pete Lancashire wrote:
> Give rsync a try. If you don't want the overhead of SSL I believe you
> can still have rsync use the
> r comma
-
From: "Russell Senior"
To: "Tom Sharples"
Cc: "General Linux/UNIX discussion and help; civil and on-topic"
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: [PLUG] Alternative to using split / cat for FTPing large file
to remote location?
>&g
> "Tom" == Tom Sharples writes:
Tom> Hello, We're building a wireless 3G IP camera system that will
Tom> FTP a large (2.5Mbyte) 10 megapixel jpeg image every 30 minutes
Tom> to a remote server, for use in a time-lapse image
Tom> application. Using a cron job, we pull the image from the
Tom> a
Give rsync a try. If you don't want the overhead of SSL I believe you
can still have rsync use the
r commands for the transfer. Can't remember been a long time.
Rsync options can also take care of the file's deletion when
successfully transfered. As a success
check may want to look at the option f
Hello,
We're building a wireless 3G IP camera system that will FTP a large
(2.5Mbyte) 10 megapixel jpeg image every 30 minutes to a remote server, for
use in a time-lapse image application. Using a cron job, we pull the image
from the attached IP cam via curl http:///img.jpg
>/tmp/image.jpg,
