"Could the auto-negotiate depend on the order in which things are turned
on?"
In a decade of working intensively with speeds of ethernet, I have never
seen this to be the case. Auto-neg is a sold standard that has been very
well tested
and implemented. Any network device made in at least the past
It could be as Neal suggests an auto-negotiate problem. This system was
working and then with no physical changes, stopped working. Could the
auto-negotiate depend on the order in which things are turned on?
Bill
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Neal wrote:
> Minor point -- the WRT54G is als
For general knowledge purposes, 192.168.0.0 is the subnet address and
192.168.0.255 is the broadcast address for that subnet. The subnet address
is used in routing tables and the broadcast address would be used by a
computer configured for DHCP to send out a DHCP request to find a DHCP
server.
-Mi
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Larry Brigman
wrote:
> 192.168.0.0/24
That's the "network" address, also off-limits for reasons I don't recall,
likely historical.
NealS
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman
192.168.0.0/24 is a broadcast address which if the dhcp is configured to
hand out 192.168.0.0
is a mistake. I don't know if the software is smart enough to know that it
shouldn't hand out a broadcast address.
Also Gigabit normally indicates auto-negotiation. If something is set to
use a specific
Do you maybe have an IP conflict? doing 192.168.0 seems odd to me. I'm
not in charge of my home network, but it appears the the modem sets the
0 subnet, and everything else (printers, computers, whatever) lives on
192.168.1.0, set by our Netgear router.
Also, you say you have it set to
use x=0
Minor point -- the WRT54G is also not gigabit. :-)
Major question -- do you have any of the switches or devices set to a
specific speed or are they all auto-negotiate?
NealS
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman
On Jul 29, 2014, at 6:20 PM, John Jason Jordan wrote:
> I have a network problem that has me baffled.
>
> I will start by describing my home network, from the cable modem on
> downwards.
>
> 1) Cable modem
> 2) Router
> 3) Two switches and a WRT54G
> 4) Patch panel mounted on the wall
> 5) Et
>
>
>
> So here's the big question: Why would the Phaser 7400 suddenly be
> unable to connect through switch 2?
>
>
It was hard to digest the whole description but the one thing that jumps
out at me is that you did not try one of the wires that worked in an HP
printer in the Phaser. The fault could
I have a network problem that has me baffled.
I will start by describing my home network, from the cable modem on
downwards.
1) Cable modem
2) Router
3) Two switches and a WRT54G
4) Patch panel mounted on the wall
5) Ethernet jacks throughout the house
6) Two computers, an HDHomeRun TV tuner, a
10 matches
Mail list logo
