Please end this here and move it to PLUG TALK.
On 5/25/09, Darren Couch wrote:
> Someone wrote:
>> This thread is plug-talk, not plug
>> appropriate.
>>
>> Computers are not sentient. Even if one
>> was sentient, the wise programmer would
>> be very careful and work very hard to
>> build in a ro
Someone wrote:
> This thread is plug-talk, not plug
> appropriate.
>
> Computers are not sentient. Even if one
> was sentient, the wise programmer would
> be very careful and work very hard to
> build in a robust ethical framework or
> at the very least a fail safe.
>
> People are not machines.
This thread is plug-talk, not plug
appropriate.
Computers are not sentient. Even if one
was sentient, the wise programmer would
be very careful and work very hard to
build in a robust ethical framework or
at the very least a fail safe.
People are not machines. Trying to
attribute feelings to
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 07:46 -0700, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
> If computers were sentient, what would software feel like?
>
> Linux is like making love.
> Windows is like prostitution.
> Viruses are like rape.
>
> ... and Mac is a very attractive and friendly prostitute :-)
...dual-booting is like
If computers were sentient, what would software feel like?
Linux is like making love.
Windows is like prostitution.
Viruses are like rape.
... and Mac is a very attractive and friendly prostitute :-)
Keith
( with a tip'o'the'hat to Linus T., whose "marriage interfering
with prostitution" sta
