On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 11:04:12 -0700
John Jason Jordan dijo:
>This morning I finally found Canon's tech support e-mail service. I
>asked if I could get a service manual or if there is a repair depot
>somewhere. But I paid $90 for it brand new several years ago, so it's
>not worth spending a lot of m
>
> For inner SE instantiations of Goodwill. Your mileage may vary.
>
True, but I've seen more computer stuffs there than the other locations I've
been to, which is not to say all of them...
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdx
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:36:33AM -0700, Mike Connors wrote:
> >
> > But I paid $90 for it brand new several years ago, so it's
> > not worth spending a lot of money to repair. Used ones sell for $10-$30
> > on eBay.
>
>
> In one of the threads I read, someone mentioned buying the scanner at
>
>
> But I paid $90 for it brand new several years ago, so it's
> not worth spending a lot of money to repair. Used ones sell for $10-$30
> on eBay.
In one of the threads I read, someone mentioned buying the scanner at
Goodwill for like
$5. So it might be worth a trip there and FreeGeek is just a
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 10:04:33 -0700
wes dijo:
>On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 12:10 AM, John Jason Jordan
>wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 21:48:30 -0700
>> wes dijo:
>>
>> >On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Mike Connors
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> >
>> >> > >http://www.sane-project.org/man/sane-plustek.5.html
>>
>
> I only tried Jaunty and Hardy x86_64, live CDs. I wanted to try
> Windows, but I have it installed only in VirtualBox OSE. The OSE
> version doesn't do USB devices. And all the software I tried are
> just different front ends for the same sane scanning program.
>
> It does appear to be a hardwa
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 12:10 AM, John Jason Jordan wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 21:48:30 -0700
> wes dijo:
>
> >On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Mike Connors
> >wrote:
> >
> >> >
> >> > >http://www.sane-project.org/man/sane-plustek.5.html
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for the link. However, the config file
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 21:48:30 -0700
wes dijo:
>On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Mike Connors
>wrote:
>
>> >
>> > >http://www.sane-project.org/man/sane-plustek.5.html
>> >
>> > Thanks for the link. However, the config file already had the x-y
>> > positions at 0. And that is all you can set. That is
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Mike Connors wrote:
> >
> > >http://www.sane-project.org/man/sane-plustek.5.html
> >
> > Thanks for the link. However, the config file already had the x-y
> > positions at 0. And that is all you can set. That is, you can set the
> > starting position of the x and y
>
> >http://www.sane-project.org/man/sane-plustek.5.html
>
> Thanks for the link. However, the config file already had the x-y
> positions at 0. And that is all you can set. That is, you can set the
> starting position of the x and y coordinates, but there is no setting
> for image area.
>
> The fa
>
> The fact that it is scanning the left 3.99 inches just fine leads me to
> wonder if it has two eyes and one of them has gone blind.
> ___
> PLUG mailing list
> PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
> http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
>
you could scan
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 09:32:28 -0700
Mike Connors dijo:
>> > I have a Canoscan LiDE 30 scanner which works fine in Linux. I
>> > haven't used it in months. This evening I suddenly need to scan
>> > two pages to send to someone via e-mail, and the recipient is
>> > desperate to receive them. Naturall
John Jason Jordan wrote:
> I know it used to scan fine in various versions of Ubuntu, Jaunty being
> the last I used before going to Fedora 11. Since it now exhibits the
> same half-page problem with the same software I used to use, I am
> pretty sure the scanner has gone tits up. Or maybe it's rep
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, John Jason Jordan wrote:
> Just now I tried live CDs of:
>
> Fedora 13 x86_64 Live (wouldn't boot - bah!)
> Jaunty x86_64 Desktop which has Xsane 0.996. Same results.
> Hardy Xubuntu x86_64, installed Xsane 0.995 from repo. Same results.
Have you tried 32-bit versions of li
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 09:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
Rich Shepard dijo:
>On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, John Jason Jordan wrote:
>
>> I have long known of the dotted rectangle, but adjusting it does not
>> help. That is, when I first click on Get Preview in the Preview
>> window it scans only the left 3.99 inches of the
>
>
>
> > I have a Canoscan LiDE 30 scanner which works fine in Linux. I haven't
> > used it in months. This evening I suddenly need to scan two pages to
> > send to someone via e-mail, and the recipient is desperate to receive
> > them. Naturally, Xsane has decided this is the moment to screw me.
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 1:45 AM, John Jason Jordan wrote:
> I have a Canoscan LiDE 30 scanner which works fine in Linux. I haven't
> used it in months. This evening I suddenly need to scan two pages to
> send to someone via e-mail, and the recipient is desperate to receive
> them. Naturally, Xsane
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 8:43 AM, John Jason Jordan wrote:
> I have long known of the dotted rectangle, but adjusting it does not
> help. That is, when I first click on Get Preview in the Preview window
> it scans only the left 3.99 inches of the page. When I adjust the
> rectangle the main window c
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, John Jason Jordan wrote:
> I have long known of the dotted rectangle, but adjusting it does not help.
> That is, when I first click on Get Preview in the Preview window it scans
> only the left 3.99 inches of the page. When I adjust the rectangle the
> main window changes the p
I have a LIDE 25 and use XSANE, on Ubuntu 10.4 (32 bit). Xsane works
flawlessly.
I suggest you completely uninstall xsane and then reinstall it. Otherwise,
if you have a digital camera with a macro setting, you might try that.
Good luck, Pat
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 8:43 AM, John Jason Jordan wro
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 07:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
Rich Shepard dijo:
>On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, John Jason Jordan wrote:
>
>> I have come to the conclusion that it is a bug.
>>
>> 1) I did the above exactly as stated and it still scans only the left
>> 3.99 inches of the page.
>
> When you look at the preview
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, John Jason Jordan wrote:
> I have come to the conclusion that it is a bug.
>
> 1) I did the above exactly as stated and it still scans only the left
> 3.99 inches of the page.
When you look at the preview there is a dashed rectangle that defines the
area to be included in t
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 02:28:39 -0700
Mike Connors dijo:
>>
>> The problem:
>>
>> I cannot figure out how to tell it the page size is 8.5 11. It
>> insists on scanning only the left side, 3.99 x 11. I cannot find a
>> page size anywhere in any of the buttons.
>>
>> Found this, hope it helps?
>
>
>
> The problem:
>
> I cannot figure out how to tell it the page size is 8.5 11. It insists
> on scanning only the left side, 3.99 x 11. I cannot find a page size
> anywhere in any of the buttons.
>
> Found this, hope it helps?
In xsane, choose Window, and enable "Show Preview" if it isn't al
I have a Canoscan LiDE 30 scanner which works fine in Linux. I haven't
used it in months. This evening I suddenly need to scan two pages to
send to someone via e-mail, and the recipient is desperate to receive
them. Naturally, Xsane has decided this is the moment to screw me.
The problem:
I canno
25 matches
Mail list logo
