Some film processing is better than others. I have some excellent prints
(and negatives) from early 1950s Germany, taken with a Leica by my dad and
processed by a local camera shop there. He reported that the processing in
the US was so bad when he got back to the States, that he sold the camera.
If it's Ubuntu 17.10 then it might be this bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1727237
which they claim was fixed in Ubuntu 18.04
Bill
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:53 AM John Sechrest wrote:
> Don't think so. How do I configure the DHCP service? This is stock
> Ubuntu...
Don't think so. How do I configure the DHCP service? This is stock Ubuntu...
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018, 4:34 PM Russell Senior
wrote:
> Are you using your own DNS server? It is possible that the captive portal
> is blocking your access to the DNS server of your choice. You might need
> to use the
I would encourage you to scan a few negatives/transparencies, measure the
time it takes and extrapolate to cover all your negatives/positives.
When I did that years ago, I quickly realized that scanners are just too
slow for what I wanted to do in a time given to me by mother nature - by
couple of
Are you using your own DNS server? It is possible that the captive portal
is blocking your access to the DNS server of your choice. You might need
to use the DHCP supplied DNS server in order for the captive portal to work.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 5:30 PM, John Sechrest wrote:
> It is a xyz.co
It is a xyz.com not found.
Where xyz changes based on location, but it is done intermediary network
domain name
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018, 3:45 PM Russell Senior
wrote:
> This is a joke, but ... you could consider not going to Starbucks ;-)
>
> I haven't seen the dns error. What is the DNS error?
This is a joke, but ... you could consider not going to Starbucks ;-)
I haven't seen the dns error. What is the DNS error?
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 4:15 PM, John Sechrest wrote:
> Recently , hotels and Starbucks have started having hotspots for wifi
> connection, which have a new behavior. Wher
Starbucks just implemented some one time captive portal that makes you sign
in and agree to something.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018, 6:15 PM John Sechrest wrote:
> Recently , hotels and Starbucks have started having hotspots for wifi
> connection, which have a new behavior. Where it used to sign me into
Recently , hotels and Starbucks have started having hotspots for wifi
connection, which have a new behavior. Where it used to sign me into
Starbucks, note it pops up a window with a dns error.
Any thoughts what the fix is for this?
___
PLUG mailing list
There is a guy in Seattle named Andrew Filer, who I met in a
then-hackerspace called Metrix:Create who modified a Kodak Carousel
projector in such a way as to backlight the slides (reduced wattage of the
bulb, replaced the heat shield with frosted glass), basically used the
projector as a slide adv
Russell,
I would be interested in the method. Picture of a screen?
-Denis
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:03 AM, Russell Senior
wrote:
> Gotcha. I don't have any better solutions for that.
>
> If they were slides, I'd suggest the method I used in Seattle a few years
> ago, that went through about
On Wed, 27 Jun 2018, Russell Senior wrote:
What kind of transparencies? If they are 35mm slides, and lots of them,
there is a better way.
Yep. I have a Wolverine F2D 35mm film to digital scanner. Stand-alone
unit. I'm about ready to put it on Craig's list as I no longer need it.
Rich
_
Gotcha. I don't have any better solutions for that.
If they were slides, I'd suggest the method I used in Seattle a few years
ago, that went through about 3000+ slides in kodak projector carousels is
an afternoon. Automation++.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Michael Rasmussen
wrote:
> Of p
Of primary interest are 2 1/4 x 2 3/4 (6x9cm) negatives from my
grandparents. After that 35mm negatives.
I was entrusted to my grandparents' negatives and am feeling a
responsibility to scan them into digital files for my relatives.
On 2018-06-27 10:10, Russell Senior wrote:
What kind of tran
Good, I like you, never got good results from Sane. Good to know that there
are other solutions. Simple scan has worked well for me.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Michael Rasmussen
wrote:
> In another group, it was suggested I try Vuescan from
> https://www.hamrick.com/
> The free Linux down
What kind of transparencies? If they are 35mm slides, and lots of them,
there is a better way.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 9:00 AM, Michael Rasmussen
wrote:
> In another group, it was suggested I try Vuescan from
> https://www.hamrick.com/
> The free Linux download untars to three binaries.
>
> It
In another group, it was suggested I try Vuescan from
https://www.hamrick.com/
The free Linux download untars to three binaries.
It just works.
Now to, when I have time, figure out the issue with xsane.
On 2018-06-26 18:37, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
I've acquired an Epson V500 flatbed scanner
While on my recent trip I was getting frequent errors when I started up
Ubuntu 16.04 on my laptop, a ThnkpPad X200 Tablet. Now that I'm back and
have the time I decided to run memtest86 to see if there were any memory
problems. I started it last night and noted that it was progressing.
This mor
On 06/26/2018 06:37 PM, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
I've acquired an Epson V500 flatbed scanner. After immediate install of
xsane and the Epson iscan drivers scanning does not work. I've added
myself to the scanner group and done a bit of unproductive googling.
Some years ago I used an Epson Perf
lsusb:
[...]
Bus 003 Device 003: ID 04b8:012c Seiko Epson Corp. GT-X900 [Perfection
V700/V750 Photo]
[...]
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:30 AM, Russell Senior
wrote:
> On You-Dumb-Too 16.04:
>
> russell@vanhorn:~$ scanimage -L
> device `epson2:libusb:003:003' is a Epson GT-X900 flatbed scanner
> r
On You-Dumb-Too 16.04:
russell@vanhorn:~$ scanimage -L
device `epson2:libusb:003:003' is a Epson GT-X900 flatbed scanner
russell@vanhorn:~$ scanimage -T
scanimage: scanning image of size 208x292 pixels at 1 bits/pixel
scanimage: acquiring gray frame, 1 bits/sample
scanimage: reading one scanline,
I have one of those since about 10 years ago, and it works for me. You
might need to add yourself to the right groups. I don't remember doing
anything special. I usually scan through gimp and xsane.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 6:37 PM, Michael Rasmussen
wrote:
> I've acquired an Epson V500 flatbe
I ended up using Simple Scan, it was a lot less problematic than Sane. I
have
a Epson, and an HP, both of them required the download of the drivers, but
with Simple Scan, I did so and "It just worked".
I have heard horror stories about scanning and either I have just had luck
or
it has just been t
23 matches
Mail list logo
