Alas, my attempts to point out reality have once again been thwarted by
hype and lofty opinions.
I'll just put on my Big Blue Hat and continue watching as Linux continues
stomping third-world platforms into the dirt. If the Digital Cinema
industry throws a tantrum over this I'll find out soon
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, Ken Stephens wrote:
Check out Cringely's article on IBM and Red Hat.
https://www.cringely.com/
In the 1980s I was told by IBMers that the company acknowledged it was not
a technology company but a service company. Because IBM put engineers at
mainframe client sites to
The point of running a project with independent management is that
individuals can come and go.
Assuming the structure of the project, the organization that defines it
does not collapse, then people can take on tasks should Red Hat employees
stop contributing.
There is a difference between
Check out Cringely's article on IBM and Red Hat.
https://www.cringely.com/
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 3:26 PM Larry Brigman
wrote:
> Not 100% sure on that last comment as most of the people running the
> infrastructure/Build systems are Redhat Employees.
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 3:16 PM Ben
Not 100% sure on that last comment as most of the people running the
infrastructure/Build systems are Redhat Employees.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 3:16 PM Ben Koenig wrote:
> FYI CentOS does not need the blessing of IBM any more than it already needs
> the blessing of Red Hat. Here's some reading
FYI CentOS does not need the blessing of IBM any more than it already needs
the blessing of Red Hat. Here's some reading material you might find
interesting.
https://www.centos.org/about/
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/council/
Change of management at Red Hat will likely have no serious
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 10:49:48 -0700
Richard England dijo:
>IBM will probably continue their Linux efforts. The better question is
>what will they do with Fedora and the desktop. IBM may have little
>interest in the desktop and their interest in non-revenue initiatives
>like Fedora and CentOS
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, Richard England wrote:
IBM will probably continue their Linux efforts. The better question is
what will they do with Fedora and the desktop. IBM may have little
interest in the desktop and their interest in non-revenue initiatives like
Fedora and CentOS are questionable, as
Good discussion on subject here:
https://www.zdnet.com/article/how-the-cloud-wars-forced-ibm-to-buy-red-hat-for-34-billion/?ftag=TRE-03-10aaa6b=20390513085982283125304917388969
-- Bill Morita
512-569-6387 (Cell)
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 8:56 AM wrote:
> Apparently Redhat Software is now part of
IBM will probably continue their Linux efforts. The better question is
what will they do with Fedora and the desktop. IBM may have little
interest in the desktop and their interest in non-revenue initiatives
like Fedora and CentOS are questionable, as well.
[Have you used their documentation
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, Dick Steffens wrote:
Probably not much. IBM has long been involved in Linux.
Such as Wietse Venema's writing and continued upgrading/maintaining of
postfix while working at IBM.
Rich
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
On 10/29/18 8:56 AM, mich...@robinson-west.com wrote:
Apparently Redhat Software is now part of IBM. What does this mean for the
Linux community?
Probably not much. IBM has long been involved in Linux.
And while it's a press release, and so taken with the appropriate grain
of salt, see:
Not yet. Still needs government approval.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018, 8:56 AM Apparently Redhat Software is now part of IBM. What does this mean for the
> Linux community?
>
> -- Michael C. Robinson
> ___
> PLUG mailing list
> PLUG@pdxlinux.org
>
Apparently Redhat Software is now part of IBM. What does this mean for the
Linux community?
-- Michael C. Robinson
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
14 matches
Mail list logo
