Corey Edwards wrote:
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 22:45, Kenneth Burgener wrote:
How is Sarge different from Debian?
Sarge is the codename for the soon-to-be-released version of Debian,
just as the current stable release is known as Woody. Each version is
named after a Toy Story character. Sid, Sarge, Wo
Corey Edwards wrote:
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 22:45, Kenneth Burgener wrote:
How is Sarge different from Debian?
Sarge is the codename for the soon-to-be-released version of Debian,
just as the current stable release is known as Woody. Each version is
named after a Toy Story character. Sid, Sarge, Wo
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 22:45, Kenneth Burgener wrote:
> How is Sarge different from Debian?
Sarge is the codename for the soon-to-be-released version of Debian,
just as the current stable release is known as Woody. Each version is
named after a Toy Story character. Sid, Sarge, Woody, Potato, Slink,
David Smith wrote:
David Smith wrote:
I have always loved Debian for this kind of setup. I usually use the
testing distribution, to avoid the massive updates in unstable and the
old
package versions in stable. The install footprint is small for a minimal
install, around 200Mb, and even a 90Mhz pro
Corey Edwards wrote:
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 22:25, David Smith wrote:
Yes, you only need one CD. I usually find the smallest netinst with a 2.4
kernel (this was about 2 years ago), and use that. Try it here:
http://www.debian.org/CD/netinst/
This one (unofficial) is only 186MB:
http://ftp.fi.debia
Well Debian was a bust. Not only did it not support ReiserFS, but it
also did not detect my Network card like the other distributions, plus
when I went to enable the module, it isn't even listed. I guess it's
off to the next contestant. I was really looking for to playing with
APT. Maybe I
Corey Edwards wrote:
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 22:25, David Smith wrote:
Yes, you only need one CD. I usually find the smallest netinst with a 2.4
kernel (this was about 2 years ago), and use that. Try it here:
http://www.debian.org/CD/netinst/
This one (unofficial) is only 186MB:
http://ftp.fi.debia
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 10:05 pm, Kenneth Burgener wrote:
> Which distribution would you say would be the best for a LAMP server.
> The machine is an OLD AMD K6-2 500MHz, 128MB RAM system. I want a
> lightning fast simple, trimmed down, non gui loaded Linux distribution.
> Any suggestions?
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 22:25, David Smith wrote:
> Yes, you only need one CD. I usually find the smallest netinst with a 2.4
> kernel (this was about 2 years ago), and use that. Try it here:
>
> http://www.debian.org/CD/netinst/
>
> This one (unofficial) is only 186MB:
>
> http://ftp.fi.debia
> David Smith wrote:
>> I have always loved Debian for this kind of setup. I usually use the
>> testing distribution, to avoid the massive updates in unstable and the
>> old
>> package versions in stable. The install footprint is small for a minimal
>> install, around 200Mb, and even a 90Mhz proce
David Smith wrote:
I have always loved Debian for this kind of setup. I usually use the
testing distribution, to avoid the massive updates in unstable and the old
package versions in stable. The install footprint is small for a minimal
install, around 200Mb, and even a 90Mhz processor with 48Mb RAM
> Which distribution would you say would be the best for a LAMP server.
> The machine is an OLD AMD K6-2 500MHz, 128MB RAM system. I want a
> lightning fast simple, trimmed down, non gui loaded Linux distribution.
> Any suggestions? I have heard that Gentoo, Debian, or Slackware are
> the most
Which distribution would you say would be the best for a LAMP server.
The machine is an OLD AMD K6-2 500MHz, 128MB RAM system. I want a
lightning fast simple, trimmed down, non gui loaded Linux distribution.
Any suggestions? I have heard that Gentoo, Debian, or Slackware are
the most sleek d
Maybe someone has already asked this but have you verified your media?
The checksums, are they good?
Dan
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:51:27 -0700, Eric Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to like Suse, I really am. But I can't even get it to
> install. Every time it dies at the same plac
When using ps and top, I would like to read virtual memory size and
resident memory size in human readable format (like 1.0 M instead of
1032), much like 'ls -h' does for file sizes.
So, rather than this:
USER PID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
root 1 0.0 0.0 1492
Not long ago, Matthew Frederico proclaimed...
> Anbody know how to kill the Zombie processes .. without rebooting?
Figure out if there's a resource it's locked over... and free it.
-=Fozz
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is Doran L. Barton, president, Iodynamics LLC
Iodynamics: Linux solutions - Web develo
Anbody know how to kill the Zombie processes .. without rebooting?
--
-- Matthew Frederico
http://www.ultrize.com
.===.
| This has been a P.L.U.G. mailing. |
| Don't Fear the Penguin. |
| IRC: #utah at irc.freenode.net |
`=
I think I've narrowed down the cause of the white screen issue on this
laptop. I have the problem whenever I boot the computer when the
battery is low. This is regardless of whether or not it's plugged in.
If I take the battery out and wake up the computer while it's plugged
in. I don't have a pro
18 matches
Mail list logo
