On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 18:03 -0600, Stuart Jansen wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 01:08 -0600, Alex Esplin wrote:
> > Comparative Advantage is entirely
> > dependent on gain (for both parties) from trade, and I won't trade
> > unless I can gain from it. In which case, no matter which party is
> > mor
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 01:08 -0600, Alex Esplin wrote:
> Comparative Advantage is entirely
> dependent on gain (for both parties) from trade, and I won't trade
> unless I can gain from it. In which case, no matter which party is
> more productive, each party from their own point of view got the
> be
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 01:08:33 -0600
Alex Esplin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 15:48, Stuart Jansen
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 14:13 -0600, Alex Esplin wrote:
> >> Even in a straight across trade, from my point of view I have to be
> >> better off than the person I'm trading with, or the
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 15:48, Stuart Jansen wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 14:13 -0600, Alex Esplin wrote:
>> Even in a straight across trade, from my point of view I have to be
>> better off than the person I'm trading with, or there is no incentive
>> to trade. Granted, this example is entirely
