No worries, that actually works in my favor. App wants mongodb 2.4+ for
some reason and I really didn't want to have to create a custom cartridge
or whatever you guys call it. :)
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Grant Shipley wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:04 AM, S. Dale Morrey >wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:04 AM, S. Dale Morrey wrote:
> Grant, I'm a little confused. It looks like OpenShift only supports
> MongoDB 2.2 deployment. I need 2.4 or better, but I can't find how to
> deploy it anywhere.
This is actually an embarrassing bug that I hope will be fixed very soon
(
Grant, I'm a little confused. It looks like OpenShift only supports
MongoDB 2.2 deployment. I need 2.4 or better, but I can't find how to
deploy it anywhere. Some of the comments in the forums indicate that an
upgrade path exists, but I don't see any information on how to do this
especially in a
comments inline. Thanks for the very well thought out and detailed
comments!
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Richard Esplin
wrote:
> Last summer I did a hobby project on OpenShift. I really like the platform,
> but left with the following lessons:
>
> * OpenShift is a neutered Git repo, so de
Last summer I did a hobby project on OpenShift. I really like the platform,
but left with the following lessons:
* OpenShift is a neutered Git repo, so deployment to OpenShift is a git push.
This has a number of ramifications: you have to understand git's arcane syntax
for simple stuff, you hav
You can set limits on how much you can scale up to. If you want to cap it
at 4 servers, you can do that.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:30 PM, S. Dale Morrey wrote:
> I'm just scared of what the costs would look like if I have 2000 users on
> websockets recieving very small packets of updated info (
I'm just scared of what the costs would look like if I have 2000 users on
websockets recieving very small packets of updated info (think a chat
server or something similar). Guess maybe I should disable scaling and
only enable it once it's needed, so long as that can actually be done. The
other p
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:30 PM, S. Dale Morrey wrote:
> No that actually sounds perfect, thank you.
> I'm going to use the free tier for initial testing. Then move to paid when
> we go live.
> Is there anyway to scale based on latency/page load time rather than by
> number of connections?
>
>
No
No that actually sounds perfect, thank you.
I'm going to use the free tier for initial testing. Then move to paid when
we go live.
Is there anyway to scale based on latency/page load time rather than by
number of connections?
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Grant Shipley wrote:
> On Tue, Jan
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:27 PM, S. Dale Morrey wrote:
> Ok so this is not intended as flamebait or a troll or anything.
> But earlier I mentioned my site running on Drupal is basically falling down
> under it's own weight.
>
> I have an extremely limited budget upfront. I'm open to completely
>
Ok so this is not intended as flamebait or a troll or anything.
But earlier I mentioned my site running on Drupal is basically falling down
under it's own weight.
I have an extremely limited budget upfront. I'm open to completely
dropping Drupal at this point and exploring other options.
One of
On 12/31/13 2:57 PM, Steve Meyers wrote:
I don't have one scheduled, and I'm going to be busy the next few weeks,
so I'd like to get it planned now if possible.
I haven't had any takers, so it looks like we will not be having a
meeting this month, unless somebody steps forward soon.
Steve
When you are on a cheap vhost you are sharing the server with upwards of 800
other vhosts.
I worked for two of the largest hosting companies in the world. That was 10
years ago and some things have changed. One company did things right. They
separated HTTP, Data, and Mail onto separate serv
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Lonnie Olson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Jason Wright
> wrote:
> > Don't get me wrong, I love wordpress, but the open source app wasn't
> built
> > for scaling.
>
> Nope, this is not true. wordpress.com uses wordpress. It's not a
> separate app
SALT LAKE CITY, UT -- Jan 13, 2014 --OpenWest 2014
The Utah Open Source Foundation is pleased to announce the OpenWest 2014
conference, May 8 - 10 in Orem, UT. The conference focuses on Open
Source, Open Hardware and Open Standards and has now opened the Call For
Papers!
OpenWest Call for Papers
My experience working at bluehost was similar, however I don't blame
Wordpress (necessarily). Most of those hacked Wordpress sites had not
updated Wordpress in a very long time and were several versions behind.
Others usually had Wordpress plugins that hadn't been updated in ages.
Also, the reas
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Mike Lovell wrote:
> Apache2 has multiple methods of doing concurrency called Multi-Processing
> Modules. You'll might want to look at changing apache to use the worker mpm
> module instead of the default prefork mpm module.
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mpm.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Jason Wright wrote:
> Don't get me wrong, I love wordpress, but the open source app wasn't built
> for scaling.
Nope, this is not true. wordpress.com uses wordpress. It's not a
separate app from the open source version.
Start using a test to determine what par
I looked into wordpress speed optimization a little while ago. What I found
is that all the PHP and MySQL code creates for a large memory footprint and
a lot of setup and teardown for each connection! If you use 10 or 20
concurrent connections to Wordpress on a smaller box, the memory will be
exhau
On 01/14/2014 10:51 AM, Daniel wrote:
I would look into the reason for the slowness. Is the memory fully used? Is
there a rogue process running? What is the root cause? If this is not
identified it could happen somewhere else.
I agree. I'd be interested in seeing some dstat output.
Kyle
/*
I would look into the reason for the slowness. Is the memory fully used? Is
there a rogue process running? What is the root cause? If this is not
identified it could happen somewhere else.
-Daniel
On Jan 14, 2014 10:05 AM, "Steve Alligood" wrote:
> ok, for extreme speed[1] and still have the ben
As others have said, take a look at your plugins and think about fronting it
with a CDN (http://www.cloudflare.com/ for example).
shameless plug:
If you decide to move, consider OpenShift. This is the project I work on at
Red Hat. We have pretty good wordpress hosting and the best part, its fr
ok, for extreme speed[1] and still have the benefits of Wordpress, you can move
the main index page and create a cron every five minutes to wget the real
wordpress page and save it as a static index page. Comments, posts, etc, will
take up to five minutes to show up, but an incredible number of
Wordpress is pretty slow for a number of reasons, but some easy things you
can do to speed it up is to install a php op-code cache, and a word press
cache plugin. I would recommend xcache http://xcache.lighttpd.net/ for the
op code cache, and probably WP-Cache for the word press cache plugin.
Oth
also check your plugins. Some of them start to get bogged down as the history
of your site gets longer. I remember dealing with one a few years ago (don't
remember the name) that would parse the entire log history for every hit. Just
Terrible.
And Wordpress itself is not a bad thing, as long
Before you jump ship, you might want to look into caching plugins.
Wordpress doesn't cache much (if anything) out of the box. You'll probably
get a good speed boost by setting up something like WP-Cache.
---
David Landry
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Merrill Oveson wrote:
> If you know ph
If you know php & html, then I'd recode using those.
Wordpress is a hacker's paradise.
When I worked tech support at BlueHost, every evening someone would call
with a hacked CMS (Content Management System)
either Wordpress, Drupal or Joomla. Wordpress by the way was the worse.
I'm not surprised
I think you might have good luck with https://www.digitalocean.com/pricing
All the stuff you're talking about only matters if you are expecting a
large traffic footprint. On the scale of a personal blog you're better off
beefing up CPU & RAM and looking at server level stuff.
This site has been ex
Pluggers,
I've been hosting my own WordPress sites for seven years or so now, and the
reality is that my sites are just running too slow. I'm using a virtual shared
server on media Temple. Admittedly I'm paying $20 a month, so I don't expect
best in class performance, but I have to do something
These guys. They have a free option that seems reasonably thorough.
Brought my site down anyways.
https://scanmyserver.com/
Eventually I plan to have a few different scans going, but for now I just
want to get past this one.
It picked up some interesting things too. Like a PHP easter egg that ha
On a side note, can I ask what security scanning service you're using?
Richard
On Jan 14, 2014, at 4:16 AM, "S. Dale Morrey" wrote:
> I'm building an online service. I expect that this may have to scale to
> tens of thousands of users. For the sake of having a drop dead simple
> deployment.
Very much so, thank you! I'll give it a shot this evening when I start
working on the project again and let you know if it's any better.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Mike Lovell wrote:
> On 01/14/2014 04:16 AM, S. Dale Morrey wrote:
>
>> I'm building an online service. I expect that this
On 01/14/2014 04:16 AM, S. Dale Morrey wrote:
I'm building an online service. I expect that this may have to scale to
tens of thousands of users. For the sake of having a drop dead simple
deployment. I decided to build the website front end on top of Drupal (the
service itself is linked to from
I'm building an online service. I expect that this may have to scale to
tens of thousands of users. For the sake of having a drop dead simple
deployment. I decided to build the website front end on top of Drupal (the
service itself is linked to from the site, but is actually delivered by
node.js
34 matches
Mail list logo
