Dazed_75 wrote:
> I do remove the quiet but I also remove the splash. Interesting that I
> never even tried leaving the splash option. I just assumed that was for
> the splash graphic and that if I left it there I would not see the
> messages I want.
>
> BTW, I also add a vga=773 (I think that w
moin moin,
I find this to be interesting.
http://tango.freedesktop.org/Tango_Icon_Theme_Guidelines#Color_Palette
Graphics in Free Software have been improving and we've been getting more
themable stuff such that we can have most everything in the same style and
we can choose the style.
Kudos to
I do remove the quiet but I also remove the splash. Interesting that I
never even tried leaving the splash option. I just assumed that was for the
splash graphic and that if I left it there I would not see the messages I
want.
BTW, I also add a vga=773 (I think that was the mode) and a verbose j
Am 03. Oct, 2007 schw�tzte Michael Sammartano so:
It was my pleasure! Helping a Human in need is a great rush!
Yes, I also like helping people. That's one of my main motivations behind
working with Free Software, I am allowed to help people.
As to the emergency exercise, I was able to confirm
betty wrote:
> one thing i really like about RH gui is that when it starts up or shuts
> down it shows a list of the processes
> on ubuntu, it doesn't do that. anyone use the ubuntu gui and know how i
> can get to see the processes that are opening or closing?
> thx in advance.
>
Remove the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Michael Sammartano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >
> > "der.hans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Am 03. Oct, 2007 schw?tzte Michael Sammartano so:
> >> > The article states that the
> >> > Senate has done little to nothing to make the public aware of the
Quoting Michael Sammartano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> "der.hans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Am 03. Oct, 2007 schw?tzte Michael Sammartano so:
>> > The article states that the
>> > Senate has done little to nothing to make the public aware of the
>>
>> The Senate? The word Senate doesn't appe
"der.hans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am 03. Oct, 2007 schw�tzte Michael Sammartano so:
>
> > I would strongly recommend that before they shoot off about the
> > resources being used, that they read the linked article. Any anger
> > should be directed to the US Senate. The article states
Am 03. Oct, 2007 schw�tzte Michael Sammartano so:
I would strongly recommend that before they shoot off about the
resources being used, that they read the linked article. Any anger
should be directed to the US Senate. The article states that the
Senate has done little to nothing to make the publ
After a long battle with technology, Josh Coffman wrote:
> On 10/3/07, betty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > one thing i really like about RH gui is that when it starts up or shuts
> > down it shows a list of the processes
> > on ubuntu, it doesn't do that. anyone use the ubuntu gui and know how
All,
I would strongly recommend that before they shoot off about the resources
being used, that they read the linked article. Any anger should be directed to
the US Senate. The article states that the Senate has done little to nothing to
make the public aware of the past tests. It also states
not sure about ubuntu, but other distros (fedora for instance) allow
you to see details with ALT+D during the splash screen.
also, i think there is a grub or kernel option for silent mode...
--silent, i think, been a while since I played with that.
On 10/3/07, betty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> o
one thing i really like about RH gui is that when it starts up or shuts
down it shows a list of the processes
on ubuntu, it doesn't do that. anyone use the ubuntu gui and know how i
can get to see the processes that are opening or closing?
thx in advance.
--
betty i.
www.WebCanine.com
resea
Original Message
Subject: [PLUG-Devel] Ann: PLUG Devel Meeting, Thursday, October 4th
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:08:40 -0700
From: Alan Dayley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: List for Linux development and software engineering
discussions. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: List for Linux dev
After a long battle with technology, Dazed_75 wrote:
> On 10/3/07, Matt Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That's what the "assign default route to this interface" checkbox in kppp
>> is for. Check it, and the PPP interface becomes the default gateway.
>> This is what most PPP users want, thoug
I'm sending this to both PLUG and ASULUG, just so everyone knows.
Off-topic, but I thought folks might like to know about this, since it
will probably have an impact on travel times and whatnot.
Apparently "the government" (as I'm not sure which agency or agencies
will be involved) will be conduc
On 10/3/07, Matt Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After a long battle with technology, Dazed_75 wrote:
> > On 10/1/07, betty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I just put ubuntu on my office computer, got it to connect o.k. to the
> > > internet, BUT it doesn't recognize my outgoing or incoming
thanks to everyone for their help, as usual, great list members
my 'office' is the office for my LLC which is just a small business. i
live out where there is ONLY dial-up, no dsl, no cable, so no choice
there. i only use that computer for banking and private emails related
to the bus
Agreed, but neither sides .ssh files have changed. I am becoming
tempted to just regenerate the keys on both sides and copy the public
key over and be done with it. But on that note, last time I did this I
did both RSA and DSA, but I can not remember my reasoning for not just
doing RSA. Any one
Bryan,
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 11:45:51AM -0700, Bryan O'Neal wrote:
> debug1: Authentications that can continue:
> publickey,gssapi-with-mic,password
> debug1: Next authentication method: publickey
> debug1: Offering public key: /backupuser/.ssh/id_rsa
> debug1: Authentications that can continue:
After a long battle with technology, Dazed_75 wrote:
> On 10/1/07, betty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just put ubuntu on my office computer, got it to connect o.k. to the
> > internet, BUT it doesn't recognize my outgoing or incoming email servers
> > and for some reason, the firefox won't conn
Ok, let us see if this make since. I have three servers that back up
nightly to my remote back up site. They all use SSH and authenticate
with RSA/DSA keys. Two of the three servers are still connecting to the
back up machine just fine but the third suddenly fails. How and why
should this happe
You might also check that you are using all USB 2.0 HIGH SPEED. IOW, USB
2.0 specifies 3 speed settings and you might want to check what yours is set
for. I saw a simialr problem a couple of years ago and found that my BIOS
had a setting for HIGH SPEED being on or not. Once I changed the BIOS
se
On 10/1/07, betty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just put ubuntu on my office computer, got it to connect o.k. to the
> internet, BUT it doesn't recognize my outgoing or incoming email servers
> and for some reason, the firefox won't connect. although i can see on
> the ext. modem (and hear on th
24 matches
Mail list logo
