Hi all,
I was wondering if anybody might point me in the right direction here.
I know that for limiting concurrent logins on a *single* machine,
you can set maxlogins in /etc/security/limits.conf.
However, this is only good for that single system. Suppose you have
three machines (foo, bar, and
Bill Jonas wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering if anybody might point me in the right direction here.
I know that for limiting concurrent logins on a *single* machine,
you can set maxlogins in /etc/security/limits.conf.
However, this is only good for that single system. Suppose you have
three
Bill Jonas wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering if anybody might point me in the right direction here.
I know that for limiting concurrent logins on a *single* machine,
you can set maxlogins in /etc/security/limits.conf.
However, this is only good for that single system. Suppose you have
Google Chrome's OmniBar is cool.
http://www.dashken.net/uploads/technology/software/Google_Chrome/Chrome_autocomplete.jpg
You can do dang near anything in that little bar, the most powerful of
which you can do in Firefox -- with no addons! (I'll bother you about
Firefox addons some other day --
Am 17. Jun, 2009 schwätzte Ryan Rix so:
moin moin Ryan,
thanks for this post! I've wondered what these things were when they were
mentioned in release info, but I never got around to figuring it out.
I see a couple of ways I can improve how I use my browser. Danke.
ciao,
der.hans
Google
sLDAP will do this nicely.
What is your distro? You can even authenticate to active-directory
and make the Windows staff field all user maintenance requests?
On 6/17/09, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
Bill Jonas wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering if anybody might point me in the right
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:31:39AM -0700, Charles Jones wrote:
What if, you created a watchdog script that ran on a central machine,
that every X seconds would ssh to all 3 machines and check for their
login. and if it sees them login to one of the machines it locks their
account and kills
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:09:14PM -0700, Eric Shubert wrote:
Why (might i ask) would you want to do such a thing? Perhaps there's a
simpler solution to whatever the problem is you're trying to solve.
In a nutshell, it's a proxy service (yes, this is for work), and users
should not be able to
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 01:43:35PM -0700, Lisa Kachold wrote:
sLDAP will do this nicely.
Ah, neat. I wasn't sure if it would or not; the documentation that I
saw didn't really address that (although I wasn't searching for (s)LDAP
specifically). Really, centralized authentication would be
this is some neat info... definitely a few days worth of reading to
really put it to full use. (expanding on what you have given and how i
want to apply it
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Ryan Rixphrkonale...@gmail.com wrote:
Google Chrome's OmniBar is cool.
this is kind of where an LDAP server comes in to play, then you cna
restrict number of concurrent logins across the network.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Bill Jonasb...@billjonas.com wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering if anybody might point me in the right direction here.
I know that for
you also may be able to configure Kerberos to this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerberos_(protocol)
-jmz
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Stephencryptwo...@gmail.com wrote:
this is kind of where an LDAP server comes in to play, then you cna
restrict number of concurrent logins across
Today's new lesson: mod_evasive
Set up on the new server, not the old one. Now can someone help me
glue my hair back on?
-Original Message-
From: Alex Dean a...@crackpot.org
To: Main PLUG discussion list plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Sent: Tue, Jun 16, 2009 7:06 pm
Subject:
13 matches
Mail list logo
