Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-07-09 Thread Joshua Zeidner
FYI: Senate passed the FISA bill, Kyl(R-AZ) votes YES, and surprisingly, McCain(R-AZ) is NOT VOTING. http://senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=2&vote=00168 -jmz On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-30 Thread Mike Schwartz
> "let it happen" crowd [...] as someone pointed out a long time ago (I think it was during - or even before - 2002), if you do a search on LIHOP you get a ton of hits - so much stuff you could never read half of it . . . Just "F Y I" -- Mike Schwartz Glendale AZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, Ju

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-30 Thread mike havens
My weekend? IT WAS TERRIBLE! The government was watching me every minute. What did I do? I played video games! Well I played one. One from '84 called Elite. IT is a first person shoot-em-up game where you are a space trader. you can be a pirate even. It is a very cool game. If any of you r

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-30 Thread Vaughn Treude
OK, this has gone on so long, I can't resist putting in my two cents: The so-called 9/11 Truth Movement has been infiltrated by the CIA, which plants ridiculous ideas (controlled demolition of the towers, missiles at the Pentagon) to discredit anyone who'd ask the most pertinent question: did "t

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-30 Thread Technomage Hawke
this was a sad and unfortunate period in our history. also, it was a time of much increased paranoia after the cuban missile crisis. People then were paid to come up with ideas on how to "justifiably invade" a nation like cuba. It is fortunate that cooler heads did prevail. The idea that 9/11 was

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-30 Thread keith smith
I can see everyone had a fun filled and interesting weekend :) Keith Smith (520) 207-9877 PHP Programmer --- On Mon, 6/30/08, Dan Lund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Dan Lund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: OT: Survelliance in America To: "Main PLU

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-30 Thread Dan Lund
I'm sure if we wanted to, we could ask one or two people who were on the 395 expressway that zips right by the Pentagon :) Thanks, Dan Lund On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:18 PM, Fritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, what I can't figure out is why the gov't just doesn't > release the video footage a

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-30 Thread Charles Jones
Fritz wrote: > So, what I can't figure out is why the gov't just doesn't > release the video footage and show everyone that > it was really a 757, not a cruise missile (as the conspiracy > theorist claim), that crashed into the Pentagon and > put an end to this nonsense? > I've wondered that mys

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-29 Thread Fritz
Charles Jones wrote: > Fritz wrote: > >> Charles Jones wrote: >> >> Charles, would you care to comment on the following? >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods >> >> If this is really true, it's quite disturbing. >> Thanks for taking the time to formulate a reply.

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-29 Thread Dan Lund
It's my guess that ultimately no one wants to ever admit that a lot of organizations within the government had their eyes closed at the same time, causing a perfect storm. Again, a guess since I'm not even going to start to say I know what happened since I wasn't a part of any of it. The way our p

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-29 Thread Joshua Zeidner
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Mike Garfias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 29, 2008, at 4:53 PM, Charles Jones wrote: >> I've encountered many people who say that 9/11 was executed by >> everything from the NY Firefighters, to the secret service. I've >> discovered that some people simply

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-29 Thread Mike Garfias
Operation Northwoods was the only good thing McNamara did while SecDef: He stopped it. On Jun 29, 2008, at 5:46 PM, Fritz wrote: > Charles Jones wrote: > > Charles, would you care to comment on the following? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods > > If this is really tr

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-29 Thread Mike Garfias
On Jun 29, 2008, at 4:53 PM, Charles Jones wrote: > I've encountered many people who say that 9/11 was executed by > everything from the NY Firefighters, to the secret service. I've > discovered that some people simply prefer to believe in conspiracy. > FYI I was living in DC at the time of

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-29 Thread Charles Jones
Fritz wrote: > Charles Jones wrote: > > Charles, would you care to comment on the following? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods > > If this is really true, it's quite disturbing. > Is this just "made up" Internet gibberish? > > As James Bamford summarizes in his book "B

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-29 Thread Fritz
Charles Jones wrote: Charles, would you care to comment on the following? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods If this is really true, it's quite disturbing. Is this just "made up" Internet gibberish? As James Bamford summarizes in his book "Body of Secrets"

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-29 Thread Dan Lund
ahhh from a thousand miles it looks so different, and when your face first into it, it looks different also. Suffice to say none of us know truth behind it all, and so the mind invents something to fill the gap. Thanks, Dan Lund On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Charles Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-29 Thread Charles Jones
Lisa Kachold wrote: Who can even say what really happened on 9/11, the corruption is soo deep and complete? I've encountered many people who say that 9/11 was executed by everything from the NY Firefighters, to the secret service. I've discovered that some people simply prefer to believe in c

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-29 Thread Dan Lund
Everyone knows voting just adds to the problem. *grins evilly and runs also* Thanks, Dan Lund On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Jason Spatafore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So I take it everybody is voting for Nader this year for *real change*? > > *runs out of room as arrows fly by* > -

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-28 Thread Jason Spatafore
So I take it everybody is voting for Nader this year for *real change*? *runs out of room as arrows fly by* --- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lis

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-28 Thread Lisa Kachold
ner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: OT: Survelliance in America To: "Main PLUG discussion list" Date: Saturday, June 28, 2008, 6:05 PM The greatest travesty in my opinion is that we have already worked through the problems that Craig cites, that is why FISA was created in the

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-28 Thread Craig White
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 21:57 -0700, Craig White wrote: > On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 21:26 -0700, Lisa Kachold wrote: > > But the big issue for PLUG members, in FISA (and legislation of it's > > type) is the new overly expensive required fiscal reporting for EBay > > and others for "economic reasons"? >

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-28 Thread Craig White
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 21:26 -0700, Lisa Kachold wrote: > But the big issue for PLUG members, in FISA (and legislation of it's > type) is the new overly expensive required fiscal reporting for EBay > and others for "economic reasons"? > > Co-located Ecommerce will simply be moved out of country i

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-28 Thread Lisa Kachold
g White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: OT: Survelliance in America To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Main PLUG discussion list" Date: Saturday, June 28, 2008, 7:55 PM On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 18:09 -0700, keith smith wrote: > > > How a

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-28 Thread Lisa Kachold
7.10 Mozilla/OpenOffice --- On Sat, 6/28/08, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: OT: Survelliance in America To: "Main PLUG discussion list" Date: Saturday, June 28, 2008, 5:20 PM On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 15:58 -0700, Jason Spat

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-28 Thread Craig White
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 18:09 -0700, keith smith wrote: > > > How about the internet is like your land line phone. The courts have > held you have an expectation of privacy. > > I personally expect my emails not to be read and I do not want > anything I do on ht web to be accessed unless they m

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-28 Thread Joshua Zeidner
America will come to pass. perhaps sooner than later. -jmz > > > > > > Keith Smith > (520) 207-9877 > PHP Programmer > > > > --- On Sat, 6/28/08, Joshua Zeidner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Joshua Zeidner <[EMA

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-28 Thread keith smith
wrote: From: Joshua Zeidner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: OT: Survelliance in America To: "Main PLUG discussion list" Date: Saturday, June 28, 2008, 5:05 PM The greatest travesty in my opinion is that we have already worked through the problems that Craig cites, that is why F

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-28 Thread keith smith
Smith (520) 207-9877 PHP Programmer --- On Sat, 6/28/08, Jason Spatafore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Jason Spatafore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: OT: Survelliance in America To: "Main PLUG discussion list" Date: Saturday, June 28, 2008, 3:58 PM We shouldn'

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-28 Thread Joshua Zeidner
The greatest travesty in my opinion is that we have already worked through the problems that Craig cites, that is why FISA was created in the first place! Allowing our intelligence agencies free and unrestricted access to such information gives far too much privilege to a small group. The fact

Re: OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-28 Thread Craig White
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 15:58 -0700, Jason Spatafore wrote: > We shouldn't be as worried about being monitored as we should be worried > about admission of the monitored activities in a court of law. > > I think it should be fine to be monitored on the Internet, just like you > shouldn't have a "re

OT: Survelliance in America

2008-06-28 Thread Jason Spatafore
We shouldn't be as worried about being monitored as we should be worried about admission of the monitored activities in a court of law. I think it should be fine to be monitored on the Internet, just like you shouldn't have a "reasonable expectation of privacy" when walking down the street. The I