On Dec 27, 2010, at 10:58 AM, Mike Ballon wrote:
Greets,
I'm looking for either an opensource or commercial package for web
deployment. In the past I have used both Replweb and WebMethods in the Windoz
world, although now I'm looking at a LAMP environment.
The reason I'm looking is
Greets,
I'm looking for either an opensource or commercial package for web
deployment. In the past I have used both Replweb and WebMethods in the
Windoz world, although now I'm looking at a LAMP environment.
The reason I'm looking is because our web team does constant updates and
deployments and
I know Cpanel was designed to do some of this, bu8t not sure if its
100% what you need. maybe peek at usermin it might have the features
you want.
maybe a stack of rsync to a serve they have access to. once they get
it the way it supposed to be fire off a script to merge it into
production with
, 12/27/10, Stephen cryptwo...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Stephen cryptwo...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Web Deployment OS or COTS (was RE: Versioning system - Subversion
Vs. Git)
To: Main PLUG discussion list plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Date: Monday, December 27, 2010, 11:03 AM
I know Cpanel
.
Keith Smith
--- On *Mon, 12/27/10, Stephen cryptwo...@gmail.com* wrote:
From: Stephen cryptwo...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Web Deployment OS or COTS (was RE: Versioning system -
Subversion Vs. Git)
To: Main PLUG discussion list plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Date: Monday, December 27, 2010
cPanel huh? Never really thought of that.
As of now they basically develop live on the dev host, commit the changes
to svn, and then someone from my team does a svn update from test and then
prod. It works for the most part, although frequency and major changes (file
permission loss is the main
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Mike Ballon mike.bal...@gmail.com wrote:
cPanel huh? Never really thought of that.
As of now they basically develop live on the dev host, commit the changes
to svn, and then someone from my team does a svn update from test and then
prod. It works for the
system - Subversion Vs. Git
To: Main PLUG discussion list plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Date: Tuesday, December 14, 2010, 11:57 AM
We also have someone who wants to put all of our Drupal stuff into a
versioning system so it would be easy to tell if something has changed on
the server. I
We also have someone who wants to put all of our Drupal stuff into a
versioning system so it would be easy to tell if something has changed on
the server. I know to little to know if this is the way to go or if this is
even possible.
from drupal maintainers-news:
CVS IS BEING REPLACED
Thanks! That pretty much makes the decision for us.
Keith Smith
--- On Tue, 12/14/10, Ariel Gold arielqg...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Ariel Gold arielqg...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Versioning system - Subversion Vs. Git
To: Main PLUG discussion list plug-discuss
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:29 PM, keith smith klsmith2...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at version systems for two different projects each on their own
server. I used Subversion about 3 years ago for just a few week so I have
little recall of subversion.
I was doing some research and
On Dec 6, 2010, at 10:29 PM, keith smith wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at version systems for two different projects each on their own
server. I used Subversion about 3 years ago for just a few week so I have
little recall of subversion.
I was doing some research and it seems Git is
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 09:19 -0600, Alex Dean wrote:
On Dec 6, 2010, at 10:29 PM, keith smith wrote:
I'm looking at version systems for two different projects each on their own
server. I used Subversion about 3 years ago for just a few week so I have
little recall of subversion.
I
or if this is even possible.
If it can aid in moving code from testing to production that would be a plus.
Really simple needs.
Keith Smith
--- On Tue, 12/7/10, Ed p...@0x1b.com wrote:
From: Ed p...@0x1b.com
Subject: Re: Versioning system - Subversion Vs. Git
To: Main
I haven't seen anything in your posts that would indicate that GIT
would be better than SVN for your needs, with the exception of the
following:
Basically all I need is a way to track updates and keep someone from over
writing someone else's changes.
Obviously there is no absolutely certain
Pickell pick...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Versioning system - Subversion Vs. Git
To: Main PLUG discussion list plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Date: Tuesday, December 7, 2010, 1:54 PM
I haven't seen anything in your posts that would indicate that GIT
would be better than SVN for your needs
.
Keith Smith
--- On *Tue, 12/7/10, Judd Pickell pick...@gmail.com* wrote:
From: Judd Pickell pick...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Versioning system - Subversion Vs. Git
To: Main PLUG discussion list plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Date: Tuesday, December 7, 2010
- Subversion Vs. Git
To: Main PLUG discussion list plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
Date: Tuesday, December 7, 2010, 1:54 PM
I haven't seen anything in your posts that would indicate that GIT
would be better than SVN for your needs, with the exception of the
following:
Basically all I need
.
David
-Original Message-
From: plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
[mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us] On Behalf Of Ed
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 3:08 PM
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: Versioning system - Subversion Vs. Git
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010
Hi,
I'm looking at version systems for two different projects each on their own
server. I used Subversion about 3 years ago for just a few week so I have
little recall of subversion.
I was doing some research and it seems Git is emerging. That makes me believe
that I should look at Git
I like the idea of local repos so I can check in files as I go, then push to
the server when I am comfortable with my changes. There is no way I could've
made the change from SVN to Git without Syntevo's software. Its not free for
commercial use, but its well worth the $75.
Services like Github
I have begun to learn and use git somewhat extensively over the past
year or so and am really liking it. To me it seems just so much more
powerful than svn or even cvs for that matter. Of course, with that
power, comes complexity and a steeper learning curve. I have a few
notes that other git
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:29 PM, keith smith klsmith2...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm looking at version systems for two different projects each on their own
server. I used Subversion about 3 years ago for just a few week so I have
little recall of subversion.
I was doing some research and it
Keith,
You know how much of an expert I am, but I have put some serious mind share
into groking Git in the past month, and I can speak to it a bit. (My
previous experience was with CVS.)
I personally wouldn't bother with anything but Git if I had the choice. I
would install it, then play a bit
Austin William Wright said:
I would go as far to say Git is *fun*.
Yes, Git is even fun. And if you read the blogs instead of the man pages,
your eyes won't gloss over, guaranteed. Google Git tutorial or Git work
flow and read only blogs. It's great fun.
--
To forgive is the highest, most
One thing I would note is that some revision control systems are about
versions of files, often groups of files with the same version number. Git
is different. It is about changes. This paradigm shift was difficult for me,
but once I got over it, Git really made sense to me.
Also, some version
26 matches
Mail list logo
