Re: Yet Another PGP Test...

2009-05-18 Thread Ryan Rix
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Tuna wrote: > That's where all my email are belong to there. wtf? -- Thanks and best regards, Ryan Rix TamsPalm - The PalmOS Blog (623)-239-1103 <-- Grand Central, baby! Jasmine Bowden - Class of 2009, Marc Rasmussen - Class of 2008, Erica Sheffey - Class of 2

Re: Yet Another PGP Test...

2009-05-17 Thread Tuna
No one else? REALLY? Fine, I'll say it. This thread is OVER. Take it somewhere else purty-please. signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change

Re: Yet Another PGP Test...

2009-05-15 Thread Tuna
Joe wrote: > Once you know how to set up the keys via openGPG, everything else is > cake. Enigma will "just work", as will the sweet firefox plugin FireGPG > (which adds GPG to Gmail through the web interface). > > In fact, you really don't even have to know how to manage openGPG via > the terminal

Re: Yet Another PGP Test...

2009-05-15 Thread Joshua Zeidner
also if you use Enigmail, I suggest using signature attachments as the embedded signatures make reading difficult for many clients such as Gmail. Enigmail is very dependable. -jmz On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Joe wrote: > Once you know how to set up the keys via openGPG, everything else

Re: Yet Another PGP Test...

2009-05-15 Thread Joe
Once you know how to set up the keys via openGPG, everything else is cake. Enigma will "just work", as will the sweet firefox plugin FireGPG (which adds GPG to Gmail through the web interface). In fact, you really don't even have to know how to manage openGPG via the terminal anymore, there are a

Re: Yet Another PGP Test...

2009-05-15 Thread Joseph Sinclair
We can get your public key now (MIT server), but the signature doesn't match on this message. The signature on the first message in this thread now checks out, however. I'm guessing that the PGP/MIME system didn't sign quite correctly to pass through the PLUG server without invalidating the sign

Re: Yet Another PGP Test...

2009-05-14 Thread Tuna
Excerpts from phrkonaleash's message of Thu May 14 10:20:36 -0700 2009: > fail. > K, how about this? > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Tuna wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > We should create a separate list for this. Like, plug-pgp. :P > > -BEGIN PGP SI

Re: Yet Another PGP Test...

2009-05-14 Thread Matthew A Coulliette
Hi, I would like to learn about encription and signatures.  Is there a good how to for Enigma and openPGP. MatthewMPP Joe wrote: If you are looking for feedback... this may have worked, but you need to upload your public key (0xBB82437A) to one of the public servers or somehow make it av

Re: Yet Another PGP Test...

2009-05-14 Thread Joe
If you are looking for feedback... this may have worked, but you need to upload your public key (0xBB82437A) to one of the public servers or somehow make it available before people can validate it. -Joe Tuna wrote: > We should create a separate list for this. Like, plug-pgp. :P -

Re: Yet Another PGP Test...

2009-05-14 Thread Ryan Rix
fail. On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Tuna wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > We should create a separate list for this. Like, plug-pgp. :P > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev

Yet Another PGP Test...

2009-05-14 Thread Tuna
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 We should create a separate list for this. Like, plug-pgp. :P -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkoLrYwACgkQcfUSTruCQ3oNdACeLxMoorN0LO+bc6BTRd76ln