Re: samba rename bug

2009-08-18 Thread Eric Shubert
Craig White wrote: On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 18:29 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: Back in March I created this bug report: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6173 That was on samba-3.0.33, which is the current version on CentOS5. I was notified today that 3.0 is no longer under

Re: samba rename bug

2009-08-18 Thread Lisa Kachold
Hi Eric... Great work! On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Eric Shuberte...@shubes.net wrote: Back in March I created this bug report: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6173 Wow, a bugzilla accolade is impressive grin. That was on samba-3.0.33, which is the current version on CentOS5.

samba rename bug

2009-08-17 Thread Eric Shubert
Back in March I created this bug report: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6173 That was on samba-3.0.33, which is the current version on CentOS5. I was notified today that 3.0 is no longer under maintenance. As it turns out, 3.2.x (the version in FC10) is also out of maintenance. The

Re: samba rename bug - solution?

2009-03-19 Thread Eric Shubert
Craig White wrote: On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 22:18 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: I gather that the problem is simply the tool you are using to manipulate the file since explorer is capable of renaming the readonly file albeit, with warning. I suspect that the rsync/cygwin combo is incapable of

Re: samba rename bug - solution?

2009-03-19 Thread Craig White
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 08:56 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: Craig White wrote: On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 22:18 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: I gather that the problem is simply the tool you are using to manipulate the file since explorer is capable of renaming the readonly file albeit, with

Re: samba rename bug - solution?

2009-03-07 Thread Eric Shubert
Craig White wrote: On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 19:11 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: I'm using rsync and cygwin to migrate some files from WinXP to samba (3.0.28-1.el5_2.1) on Centos (5.2). Files that have the read-only attribute are failing the final rename with permission denied. Permissions are

Re: samba rename bug - solution?

2009-03-07 Thread Eric Shubert
Craig White wrote: On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 20:20 -0700, Nathan England wrote: On Friday 06 March 2009 20:03:14 Craig White wrote: On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 19:11 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: I'm using rsync and cygwin to migrate some files from WinXP to samba (3.0.28-1.el5_2.1) on Centos (5.2). Files

Re: samba rename bug - solution?

2009-03-07 Thread Eric Shubert
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 8:40 PM To: Main PLUG discussion list Subject: Re: samba rename bug - solution? On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 20:20 -0700, Nathan England wrote: On Friday 06 March 2009 20:03:14 Craig White wrote: On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 19:11 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: I'm using rsync

Re: samba rename bug - solution?

2009-03-07 Thread Eric Shubert
Craig White wrote: I would suspect that the version isn't as important here as making sure that the filesystem is mounted with extended attributes. Here's the pertinent part of my smb.conf: map archive = no map hidden = no map read only = no map system = no

Re: samba rename bug - solution?

2009-03-07 Thread Eric Shubert
Eric Shubert wrote: Craig White wrote: I would suspect that the version isn't as important here as making sure that the filesystem is mounted with extended attributes. Here's the pertinent part of my smb.conf: map archive = no map hidden = no map read only = no

Re: samba rename bug - solution?

2009-03-07 Thread Craig White
On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 08:10 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: Craig White wrote: I would suspect that the version isn't as important here as making sure that the filesystem is mounted with extended attributes. Here's the pertinent part of my smb.conf: map archive = no map

Re: samba rename bug - solution?

2009-03-07 Thread Eric Shubert
Craig White wrote: On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 08:10 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: Craig White wrote: I would suspect that the version isn't as important here as making sure that the filesystem is mounted with extended attributes. Here's the pertinent part of my smb.conf: map archive = no

Re: samba rename bug - solution?

2009-03-07 Thread Craig White
On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 09:42 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: Craig White wrote: On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 08:10 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: Craig White wrote: I would suspect that the version isn't as important here as making sure that the filesystem is mounted with extended attributes. Here's

Re: samba rename bug - solution?

2009-03-07 Thread Eric Shubert
Craig White wrote: On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 09:42 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: Craig White wrote: On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 08:10 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: Craig White wrote: I would suspect that the version isn't as important here as making sure that the filesystem is mounted with extended

RE: samba rename bug - solution?

2009-03-07 Thread Bob Elzer
@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us Subject: Re: samba rename bug - solution? Eric Shubert wrote: Craig White wrote: I would suspect that the version isn't as important here as making sure that the filesystem is mounted with extended attributes. Here's the pertinent part of my smb.conf: map

RE: samba rename bug - solution?

2009-03-07 Thread Bob Elzer
-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us [mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us] On Behalf Of Eric Shubert Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 9:42 AM To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us Subject: Re: samba rename bug - solution? Craig White wrote: On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 08:10 -0700, Eric

Re: samba rename bug - solution?

2009-03-07 Thread Curtis Zinzilieta
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 20:20 -0700, Nathan England wrote: On Friday 06 March 2009 20:03:14 Craig White wrote: On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 19:11 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: I'm using rsync and cygwin to migrate some files from WinXP to samba (3.0.28-1.el5_2.1) on Centos (5.2). Files that have the

Re: samba rename bug - solution?

2009-03-07 Thread Craig White
On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 11:01 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: Craig White wrote: On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 09:42 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: Craig White wrote: On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 08:10 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: Craig White wrote: I would suspect that the version isn't as important here as

Re: samba rename bug - solution?

2009-03-07 Thread Craig White
On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 19:57 -0700, Curtis Zinzilieta wrote: On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 20:20 -0700, Nathan England wrote: On Friday 06 March 2009 20:03:14 Craig White wrote: On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 19:11 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: I'm using rsync and cygwin to migrate some files from WinXP to

Re: samba rename bug - solution?

2009-03-07 Thread Eric Shubert
Craig White wrote: On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 11:01 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: Craig White wrote: On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 09:42 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: Craig White wrote: On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 08:10 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: Craig White wrote: I would suspect that the version isn't as

Re: samba rename bug - solution?

2009-03-07 Thread Craig White
On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 22:18 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: I gather that the problem is simply the tool you are using to manipulate the file since explorer is capable of renaming the readonly file albeit, with warning. I suspect that the rsync/cygwin combo is incapable of making a useful

RE: samba rename bug - solution?

2009-03-07 Thread Bryan O'Neal
8:52 PM To: Main PLUG discussion list Subject: Re: samba rename bug - solution? On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 11:01 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: Craig White wrote: On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 09:42 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: Craig White wrote: On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 08:10 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: Craig

samba rename bug - solution?

2009-03-06 Thread Eric Shubert
I'm using rsync and cygwin to migrate some files from WinXP to samba (3.0.28-1.el5_2.1) on Centos (5.2). Files that have the read-only attribute are failing the final rename with permission denied. Permissions are all ok, and I've verified with manual testing that when attempting to rename a

Re: samba rename bug - solution?

2009-03-06 Thread Nathan England
On Friday 06 March 2009 20:03:14 Craig White wrote: On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 19:11 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: I'm using rsync and cygwin to migrate some files from WinXP to samba (3.0.28-1.el5_2.1) on Centos (5.2). Files that have the read-only attribute are failing the final rename with

Re: samba rename bug - solution?

2009-03-06 Thread Craig White
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 20:20 -0700, Nathan England wrote: On Friday 06 March 2009 20:03:14 Craig White wrote: On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 19:11 -0700, Eric Shubert wrote: I'm using rsync and cygwin to migrate some files from WinXP to samba (3.0.28-1.el5_2.1) on Centos (5.2). Files that have the

RE: samba rename bug - solution?

2009-03-06 Thread Bryan O'Neal
...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us [mailto:plug-discuss-boun...@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us] On Behalf Of Craig White Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 8:40 PM To: Main PLUG discussion list Subject: Re: samba rename bug - solution? On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 20:20 -0700, Nathan England wrote: On Friday 06 March 2009 20