I personally like the 1-10 rating system. It lets me fine tune my Three
ratings that's all. when i start getting towards the 8's & above it
does the same. Though like stated above my rating of a track depends on
what i ate for breakfast, what time of the day & even what underwear i'm
wearing. The
jania Wrote:
> If the rating scale was change from 1-5 to 1-10 it would be a lot of
> work for those of us that have rated most of our music on the 1-5
> scale.
> I'm not too eager to go through and re-rate all my music.
>
If you are talking about TrackStat or slimserver ratings it would not
be
If the rating scale was change from 1-5 to 1-10 it would be a lot of
work for those of us that have rated most of our music on the 1-5
scale.
I'm not too eager to go through and re-rate all my music.
Personally I find 1-5 to be enough, sometimes I have trouble deciding
if a song should be a 3 or
Yes I am a user, many thanks for your explanation
--
ajmitchell
ajmitchell's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=800
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=21790
Slimserver internally and also TrackStat uses a rating system between
1-100, so the 1-5 limitation today is just in the user interface and
CLI interface of TrackStat.
If more people requests it I can quite easy change it so it supports
1-10 ratings, the main problem is probably just that everyone
I seriously doubt I would ever want to rate tracks as finely as 48, 49,
50, but I could see myself using ratings of 50, 55, 60.
At the very least, a 0-9 system would be a lot more useful than 1-5.
With 1-5, loading up a playlist of 4+ gives me only a tiny portion of
my collection (maybe 5%), w
I've had some success with ClarkConnect.
I had to install ActivePerl, perl-XML-parser and perl-Archive. I also
had to dink around with Samba somewhat.
It seems to meet most of my needs. I want to warn others, however,
that Norton Internet Security is the spawn of the devil.
Thanks again for s
Pale Blue Ego Wrote:
> ...the main problem is how to populate the file tags from the ratings
> field. I suppose it could be done with a separate script that calls a
> command-line tagger.
>
This shouldn't be a problem, its easy to access the slimserver database
from outside in the 6.5 release s
A few thoughts:
I like the idea of a ratings tag in the actual file itself. That way,
it moves with the file. But rating files from the slimserver interface
becomes a problem, then. You don't ever want slimserver to write tags.
But you could get slimserver to write to the ratings field in the
