Re: [pmacct-discussion] Aggregation of sflow and netflow

2014-09-10 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hi TC, Inline: On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:21:08PM +, itria30...@itri.org.tw wrote: > Can sfacctd and nfacctd listen on the same port? (in my use case it's port > '')?? In another post said it's not allowed. Somehow I think it's > worthy to ask for pmacct 1.5 is released. No, you st

Re: [pmacct-discussion] More precise flow timestamp

2014-09-10 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hi TC, timestamp_end applies to NetFlow/IPFIX only. sFlow samples do not contain a start and an end time but only an "observation" time. Cheers, Paolo On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:04:27PM +, itria30...@itri.org.tw wrote: > Hi Paolo, > > I have correct timestamp_start value and I will disabl

[pmacct-discussion] Aggregation of sflow and netflow

2014-09-10 Thread itriA30110
Hi Paolo and all, In my network environment there is 1 netflow device and 3 sflow devices. I've been told there's only sflow devices in our data-center. This netflow device is a surprise to me. Can sfacctd and nfacctd listen on the same port? (in my use case it's port '')?? In another

Re: [pmacct-discussion] More precise flow timestamp

2014-09-10 Thread itriA30110
Hi Paolo, I have correct timestamp_start value and I will disable sql_history. In latest trail I found I missed aggregate 'timestamp_end'. But I noticed a weird thing that my timestamp_end was wrong: I also checked the post @2013. It seems ' timestamp_end' aggregate was already done. Do you

Re: [pmacct-discussion] More precise flow timestamp

2014-09-10 Thread itriA30110
Hi Paolo, The "timestamp_start" primitive solve my problem. Thank you. mysql> select * from acct_v9 limit 3; +-+---+--+--+-+--+---+