Re: [pmacct-discussion] sfacct feature suggestion - traffic in/out direction

2016-07-28 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hi Jordan, Inline: On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:01:47AM +0300, Jordan wrote: > I mean that when you enable sflow on an interface you cannot > configure ingress/egress option. > It captures both directions while we need only data for ingress traffic. Just curious, which device is this? Never seen

Re: [pmacct-discussion] sfacct feature suggestion - traffic in/out direction

2016-07-27 Thread Jordan
scussion-boun...@pmacct.net] *On Behalf Of *Jordan *Sent:* Wednesday, July 27, 2016 5:06 PM *To:* pmacct-discussion@pmacct.net *Subject:* [pmacct-discussion] sfacct feature suggestion - traffic in/out direction Hello, We're having issues with equipment that cannot separate inbound/outb

Re: [pmacct-discussion] sfacct feature suggestion - traffic in/out direction

2016-07-27 Thread Jentsch, Mario
and filter e.g. the ingress flows with ! pre_tag_filter[ingress]: 1,3 aggregate[ingress]: … ! Regards, Mario From: pmacct-discussion [mailto:pmacct-discussion-boun...@pmacct.net] On Behalf Of Jordan Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 5:06 PM To: pmacct-discussion@pmacct.net Subject: [pmacct-discussion] sf

[pmacct-discussion] sfacct feature suggestion - traffic in/out direction

2016-07-27 Thread Jordan
Hello, We're having issues with equipment that cannot separate inbound/outbound traffic using sflow V5. Looking at the sflow V5 protocol it's having the following fields. Usually they match the snmp interface indexes. /source_id/ /interface input/ /interface output/ What I suggest as a new