Armin
Tried your code and timed the two selection techniques with a 5000 feature
limit querying a shapefile - both about 8.5 mins!!! - so no real performance
gain using the old code. Takes ~45sec with a 1000 feature limit and about
13 secs with a 500 feature limit (working from a low performance
If you want to try the highlight method with the 2 files I put in the
zip file, you need to limit the number of features to be returned for
the result table. Just try setting it to 100. The highlight using the
querymap will nevertheless highlight *all* found features. So I guess
it should make a
just an update: I made a quick test, using the normal highlight. This
is not really slowing down things. If I disable the result table
creation the map is rendered quite fast with the default highlight,
even when 6 or 7000 features are returned. The JSON string returned
however is close to 2 MB!
Armin
Although I had been doing some JS error checking in firefox I have done most
of the selects in IE7 - as you hinted big mistake (unfortunately IE is still
used by ~50% share of the intended UK audience)! FF is about 20secs for
5000 features - hohum! I agree about how many results do you
On 25/08/2010 09:53, Dejan Gambin wrote:
Hi,
I would just like to know if this is an expected behaviour:
yes, if you want another logic you need to modify the pm.toc.js
I have a category with two groups. Each group consist of several mapfile
layers having the same GROUP. I set
I updated the docs for this issue, see limitations part at
http://svn.pmapper.net/trac/wiki/DocManual?version=77#JoiningDatabasetablestolayers
armin
On 24/08/2010 13:07, Dejan Gambin wrote:
Hi,
I have successfully made a join from shape file to MySQL database using
RESULT_JOIN syntax like
Armin,
Thanks for the information. Do you think it would be possible to use native
MapServer joins for this, like described here:
http://mapserver.org/mapfile/join.html
and use MySQL fields in RESULT_FIELDS? I suppose not...
regards, dejan
On 25. kol. 2010., at 19:28, Armin Burger wrote:
Thanks very much for the info
regards, dejan
On 25. kol. 2010., at 19:20, Armin Burger wrote:
On 25/08/2010 09:53, Dejan Gambin wrote:
Hi,
I would just like to know if this is an expected behaviour:
yes, if you want another logic you need to modify the pm.toc.js
I have a category
