> I really haven't understood why using the (:markup:) markup is so
> terrible. Maybe I'm strange, but when I was first using PmWiki and
> reading the documentation, I was reading the documentation, not looking
> at the documentation source. It didn't even occur to me to do so.
> Thus I consider
We are in the process of moving our wiki to a new server. I have managed to get the wiki to work on the new server, but the clean URL function will not work. I have tried the methods described on the Clean URL page with no success. Here are the details:1. Have checked through the apache2 c
Last month there was a rather active discussion on the list regarding
rating cookbook recipes on pmwiki.org, but it kind of died down
without any resolution.
So, to re-start this topic I propose the following two changes to the
pmwiki.org cookbook section. These draw on mainly three preceding
mess
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 02:34:25PM -0500, Sandy wrote:
> Kathryn Andersen wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:07:19AM +0100, Peter Bowers wrote:
> > [huge snip]
> >> Back on topic ... does the idea of 2 pages clarify things? (Assuming it
> >> was implemented in a way that actually works.) I'm
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 09:57:08AM -0800, Karl Schilke wrote:
> I tried making an InterMap like this:
>
> DOI: http://dx.doi.org/$1
>
> However, when I write something like 'Ghasemi, et al.
> (DOI:10.1021/la701126t) found that ...' in a PmWiki page, the URL I
> get is 'http://dx
Kathryn Andersen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:07:19AM +0100, Peter Bowers wrote:
> [huge snip]
>> Back on topic ... does the idea of 2 pages clarify things? (Assuming it
>> was implemented in a way that actually works.) I'm thinking these pages
>> won't get updated very often at all and s
Hello,
I'm trying to make an InterMap that will resolve Digital Object
Identifiers (DOI's) for scientific papers. Every publication is
assigned a unique DOI that can be resolved by a centralized dispatch
viewer. For instance, a recent paper by Ghasemi, et al. (2007) has the
DOI '10.1021/la
I wondered if a newbie opinion would be useful in thinking of what to put on
this page.
My first day using PmWiki I got stuck because I had no idea how to get
started. So I went to Google and found a link to the PmWiki site showing
examples of how to format text in a wiki. This was great informatio
Audun Myhra Bergwitz skrev:
> I might need a wikifarm, so I deceided to test it. I already have a
> running installation of PMwiki, so I deceided to use that as the home
> wiki. I followed the instructions on how to make a Wikifarm, but there
> are some problems:
But I found the cause and fixed the
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:07:19AM +0100, Peter Bowers wrote:
[huge snip]
> Back on topic ... does the idea of 2 pages clarify things? (Assuming it
> was implemented in a way that actually works.) I'm thinking these pages
> won't get updated very often at all and so the potential issues of (1)
>
- The following is an automated response
- to your message generated on behalf of philippe.kr...@thalesgroup.com
Bonjour, je suis en congé entre le 13/02/09 midi et le 22/02/09 au
soir. Je lirais probablement mes mails de temps en temps, mais en cas
d'urgence, vous pouvez me conta
2009/2/13 Christian Ridderström :
> Thanks for the explanation. Perhaps it'd be an idea to place this
> information on the recipe page, or a page linked to by that page.
> (Or perhaps in the recipe code).
>
> This sounds like a reciped that I'd like to use, but I'd propbably be a bit
> worried that
I think that the new EditingForNewcomers page is a *great* resource...
Thanks for putting the time & energy into initially planning it and now
implementing it, John! [polite applause in the background]
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:06 AM, wrote:
> >>A case can also be made that this and other "cor
13 matches
Mail list logo
