Le 05/05/2011 03:26, Jeff Greer a écrit :
I personally prefer pmwiki just the way it is. The markup is much
more versatile than a WYSIWYG interface. However, I have customers
that really WANT a WYSIWYG. It would be nice to have one available for
them. I am certain it would increase the user bas
I personally prefer pmwiki just the way it is. The markup is much more
versatile than a WYSIWYG interface. However, I have customers that really
WANT a WYSIWYG. It would be nice to have one available for them. I am
certain it would increase the user base of pmwiki significantly.
Jeff
On Wed, May
I think I'll regret this, but what YAFISYGI means, or is it just a
play with WYSIWYGT?
On 5/4/11, Brian Tibbels wrote:
> Me too - except I call it YAFISYGI.
>
> :)
>
___
pmwiki-users mailing list
pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com
http://www.pmichaud.com/mailma
Hello!
I'm trying to integrate http://www.pmwiki.org/pmform/PmForm/Comments recipe
to add comments functional to my pages. The only thing I need is to let my
anonymous site's visitors add comments to pages. The problem is that posting
this form deletes my Page Variables, existed on the page before
Me too - except I call it YAFISYGI.
:)
On 4 May 2011 19:09, Kenneth Forsbäck wrote:
> Yikes!
>
> How did I miss that! No thank you...only if it is optional and I can safely
> delete it and all including scripts for all eternity without having to worry
> about any problems.
>
> I much prefer W
Yikes!
How did I miss that! No thank you...only if it is optional and I can
safely delete it and all including scripts for all eternity without
having to worry about any problems.
I much prefer WYSIWYM.
On 2011-05-04 8:53 pm, Al Louis Ripskis wrote:
Guys,
At the end of March there was a lot
Guys,
At the end of March there was a lot of traffic about the need for some form of
WYSIWYG for PmWiki.
Almost everyone was in favor of it.
Now the question is, what has happened since then?
Who can give us a progress report?
Much thanks,
Al
___
pm
