Re: [pmwiki-users] Status of 2.2 non-beta release?

2008-05-01 Thread John Rankin
>Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 15:24:03 +0200 >From: marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [pmwiki-users] Status of 2.2 non-beta release? >To: pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > >Patri

Re: [pmwiki-users] Status of 2.2 non-beta release?

2008-05-01 Thread marc
Patrick R. Michaud said... > Would the community prefer that I go ahead and issue a 2.2.0 > release now, with the understanding that the remaining RoadMap > features will appear in a later minor release? Or should I > continue to hold the "beta" designation until those later > features are done?

Re: [pmwiki-users] Status of 2.2 non-beta release?

2008-04-30 Thread Hans Huijgen
2008/4/29 [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > *But*, as Clayton Curtis has problems in adopting non formally stable > software, I suggest the 2.2.0 version is now issued quickly; any other > enhancement will eventually follow at due time. Political correct answer :) I do agree, though. It'

Re: [pmwiki-users] Status of 2.2 non-beta release?

2008-04-29 Thread pmwiki
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:19:27 -0500 "Patrick R. Michaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would the community prefer that I go ahead and issue a 2.2.0 > release now, with the understanding that the remaining RoadMap > features will appear in a later minor release? Or should I > continue to hold the "b

[pmwiki-users] Status of 2.2 non-beta release?

2008-04-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd personally prefer to think that any tiny second of Patrick's precious time is spent adding planned features instead of formally releasing a 2.2 version which has already proven to be more than stable. *But*, as Clayton Curtis has problems in adopting non formally stable software, I suggest the

Re: [pmwiki-users] Status of 2.2 non-beta release?

2008-04-29 Thread Henrik Bechmann
I would favour releasing 2.2, and including the outstanding features in 2.21. - Henrik Patrick R. Michaud wrote: On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 07:33:30PM +0200, Hans Huijgen wrote: 2008/4/9 Curtis, Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Is there any further news on the release of non-beta 2.2? Our

Re: [pmwiki-users] Status of 2.2 non-beta release?

2008-04-29 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 07:33:30PM +0200, Hans Huijgen wrote: > 2008/4/9 Curtis, Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Is there any further news on the release of non-beta 2.2? Our agency has a > > policy about not running beta software, and I'd like to be able to move to > > the newer version (I'm on

Re: [pmwiki-users] Status of 2.2 non-beta release?

2008-04-29 Thread Hans Huijgen
2008/4/9 Curtis, Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Is there any further news on the release of non-beta 2.2? Our agency has a > policy about not running beta software, and I'd like to be able to move to > the newer version (I'm on 2.1.26 as things stand). Within pmwiki's philosophy a beta is not fin

Re: [pmwiki-users] Status of 2.2 non-beta release?

2008-04-29 Thread Martin Bischoff
Any news about this? Thanks On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Curtis, Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any further news on the release of non-beta 2.2? Our agency has > a policy about not running beta software, and I'd like to be able to move to > the newer version (I'm on 2.1.26 as

[pmwiki-users] Status of 2.2 non-beta release?

2008-04-09 Thread Curtis, Clayton
Is there any further news on the release of non-beta 2.2? Our agency has a policy about not running beta software, and I'd like to be able to move to the newer version (I'm on 2.1.26 as things stand). Failing a release pretty soon, I may be compelled to migrate to MediaWiki, which has built-in fe