On 07/21/2010 09:29 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
6) But I similarly-and-worse forgot to produce a /drop-in/ pod2man
replacement.
That's okay, I did that. :)
Wow, cool, thanks!
See what I mean about my mind being stoner Swiss cheese!
Oy, pod2html, Pod::Simple::HTMLLegacy, Pod::Simple::HTML, wha
"Sean M. Burke" writes:
> Oh crap! I thought I fixed this years ago!
> Namely, I thought I had replaced the innards of pod2man and pod2html with
> something that used Pod::Simple, since Pod::Simple is The Way, and that
> all other parsing would be a difficult and confusing duplication of
> alread
Preamble:
Making pod2html use Pod::Simple::HTMLLegacy /might/ actually be
simpler than patching Pod::HTML or Pod::Parser or whatever.
About my bungling:
On 07/20/2010 01:00 PM, Ricardo Signes wrote:
I would like to see pod2html (as a Pod::Html-based thing) be replaced with
Pod::Simple, which
On 07/20/2010 10:03 AM, Ronald J Kimball wrote:
[...]
According to the spec, the asterisk or number should be by itself in the
=item paragraph; additional text should be in a separate verbatim
paragraph.
[...]
As preface: I, as author of perlpodspec, hereby disclaim any special
insight into =i
(Short version: making pod2html use Pod::Simple::HTMLLegacy /might/
actually be simpler than patching Pod::HTML or Pod::Parser or whatever.)
On 07/20/2010 01:00 PM, Ricardo Signes wrote:
I would like to see pod2html (as a Pod::Html-based thing) be replaced with
Pod::Simple, which should fix thi
