Re: pod checker that finds missing internal links?

2012-02-20 Thread Sean M. Burke
As I stumble past this list, which I don't follow much anymore, I'll give a few responses to, but not definitive answers to, some issues that are either because of things in perlpodspec, or because of things not in Perlpodspec. Here goes...

Re: Pod::Simple doesn't warn when the text of a definition =item matches /[\*\d]/; and a fix to this bug

2012-02-20 Thread Sean M. Burke
On 02/19/2012 02:19 PM, Marc Green wrote: Hello Pod People, When given the following input, Pod::Simple does not warn that the [text] portion of the 2nd and 3rd =item is invalid. In passing, I'll note that the =over ... =item ... =back code was some of the hardest notions/code in

Re: .pod files

2012-02-20 Thread Sean M. Burke
On 02/09/2012 04:34 AM, David Cantrell wrote: I doubt you'll ever see a distribution which has POD in both Foo/Bar.pm and Foo/Bar.pod, because the perldoc tool will only see one or the other when a user types 'perldoc Foo::Bar'. +1 ! ...by which I mean that I took this as a given: when Perl

Re: Scrunched up string literals in Pod::Simple tests

2012-02-20 Thread Sean M. Burke
On 02/20/2012 06:58 PM, Florent Angly wrote: Hi Sean, You are right that Pod::Simple has problems with multiline POD strings contained into a variable or heredoc section: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=36404 https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=69390 Oh now I remember...