">.
>
>> Just strip the L<> and leave the contents of the link as-is?
>
>Do you think that will make sense enough for entries like perlfunc/die?
>Or perlre/"Regular Expressions" or something like that?
If it doesn't isnt there now a form of L<> which allows text seen to
be specified?
--
Nick Ing-Simmons
http://www.ni-s.u-net.com/
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>And are you sure that Pod::HTML is dealing with index entries? I didn't
>realize that HTML had tags for index entries.
But you can build an index page using normal tags which hot links to the
page with the indexed item.
--
Nick
rs are in that set.
>
>Thats a heckuva lot more accommodating and less restrictive than
>forbidding most forms of nesting (something which I'm not willing to do
>because Pod::Parser gets used for lots more stuff than just translation
>and removing the nesting will break lots of code that I personally have
>a stake in).
Nesting is good. It is particularly natural for HTML/XML back ends.
--
Nick Ing-Simmons
