I’m at the QAH, and have continued digging into some CPAN Testers fails for
Pod::Simple::Search. I previously emailed about this to cpan-workers, but it’s
become pod specific, so RJBS suggested this mailing list.
To fix some of them I made find() and survey() be consistent with respect to
what
> I talked this through with RJBS, who suggested the order should instead be:
>
> .pod .pm .pl .plx
>
> David, you added the comment to the code that’s mentioned above. Was there a
> reason you added that comment, or were you just commenting on what the code
> was doing? (like much of th
Does this mean that there is a "find"-like function in Pod::Simple that
replaces Pod::Find? That would be an opportunity to discontinue Pod::Find along
with Pod::Parser...
-Marek
Von meinem Samsung Gerät gesendet.
On Apr 23, 2016, at 9:45 AM, Neil Bowers wrote:
> I talked this through with RJBS, who suggested the order should instead be:
>
> .pod .pm .pl .plx
>
> David, you added the comment to the code that’s mentioned above. Was there a
> reason you added that comment, or were you just commenti
On Apr 29, 2016, at 11:41 AM, Karl Williamson wrote:
> Looking at the man page, it looks like Pod::Simple::Search does a similar
> function as Pod::Find does
Yes, and it has been there since forever.
Best,
David
* "David E. Wheeler" [2016-04-29T16:43:03]
> Anyone object to making Neil a committer and co-maint on Pod-Simple? (I’m
> hoping Neil doesn’t object.) The canonical repository is here:
No objection, and I preemptively overrule Neil's potential objection.
--
rjbs
signature.asc
Description: Digi
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Ricardo Signes
wrote:
> * "David E. Wheeler" [2016-04-29T16:43:03]
> > Anyone object to making Neil a committer and co-maint on Pod-Simple? (I’m
> > hoping Neil doesn’t object.) The canonical repository is here:
>
> No objection, and I preemptively overrule Neil'
>> Anyone object to making Neil a committer and co-maint on Pod-Simple? (I’m
>> hoping Neil doesn’t object.) The canonical repository is here:
>
> No objection, and I preemptively overrule Neil's potential objection.
Ha!
Ok.
On 04/24/2016 11:34 PM, Marek Rouchal wrote:
Does this mean that there is a "find"-like function in Pod::Simple that
replaces Pod::Find? That would be an opportunity to discontinue
Pod::Find along with Pod::Parser...
-Marek
Looking at the man page, it looks like Pod::Simple::Search does a
