Re: IKC bug for client spawn?

2009-05-05 Thread Josh803316
Nick, I definitely think it might be simpler... I was hoping to be able to control the workers spawing on startup based on a passed list. I was also hoping that I could spawn a remote client to do some load sharing in the future. I would prefer to manage it all from the server startup. New clie

Re: IKC bug for client spawn?

2009-05-05 Thread Nick Perez
On Tue, 5 May 2009 15:54:13 -0700 Josh803316 wrote: > Yes, thanks to some members of the list I have been taught that this > is indeed correct and not a bug. Makes more sense now. > > I was trying to spawn a worker child but wasn't spawning it correctly > therefore the process was indeed inside

Re: IKC bug for client spawn?

2009-05-05 Thread Josh803316
Yes, thanks to some members of the list I have been taught that this is indeed correct and not a bug. Makes more sense now. I was trying to spawn a worker child but wasn't spawning it correctly therefore the process was indeed inside the same kernel. I'm now using a wheel::run to spawn the child

Re: IKC bug for client spawn?

2009-05-05 Thread Nick Perez
On Tue, 5 May 2009 10:34:53 -0700 Josh803316 wrote: > It appears that if you start an IKC server and then an ikc client > connects to it from within the same POE::Kernel->run() then we get > the following error: > > 23289: Remote kernel 'host.domain-4a0076da5af9' already exists > 23289: Remo

IKC bug for client spawn?

2009-05-05 Thread Josh803316
It appears that if you start an IKC server and then an ikc client connects to it from within the same POE::Kernel->run() then we get the following error: 23289: Remote kernel 'host.domain-4a0076da5af9' already exists 23289: Remote kernel 'host.domain-4a0076da5af9' already exists Single pr