t;. The data comes out of a file. I hardcoded it here to simplify
matters and got mixed up.
Thanks,
David
-Original Message-
From: David Landgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 10:25 AM
To: poe@perl.org
Subject: Stuck on a POE::Wheel::SocketFactory
Hel
On Sep 12, 2005, at 11:25, David Landgren wrote:
for my $t( @$task ) {
POE::Wheel::SocketFactory->new(
RemoteAddress => $t->{host},
RemotePort => $t->{port},
SocketProtocol => $t->{proto},
SuccessEvent => 'succeed'
#x27;, proto => 'tcp', port => 25 },
{ name => 'ns.example.com', proto => 'udp', port => 53 },
];
sub succeed {
print "\nok\n";
print "$_\n" for @_;
$poe_kernel->yield( 'shutdown' );
}
sub fail {
print "\nnok
David Landgren wrote:
[...]
I'm wondering whether the return values from should be assigned and
^
POE::Wheel::SocketFactory
That might make a bit more sense, sorry.
David
ort => 25 },
{ name => 'ns.example.com', proto => 'udp', port => 53 },
];
sub succeed {
print "\nok\n";
print "$_\n" for @_;
$poe_kernel->yield( 'shutdown' );
}
sub fail {
print "\nnok\n";
print &
t/perl5/bin/perl5.8 -w
use POE;
$|=1;
my $obj = new MyDebug;
POE::Session->create(
object_states => [ $obj => [ '_start', 'next', 'reaper', 'output' ]]);
POE::Kernel->run;
exit(0);
#
# Now define our class w
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 09:49:13PM -0600, Jay Strauss wrote:
>
> Ah ha,
>
> A documentation bug, In perldoc POE::Component::Client::TCP
>
>Filter
>
>For example, this changes the line separator to a vertical pipe:
>
>Filter => [ "POE::Filter::Line", Inpu
Ah ha,
A documentation bug, In perldoc POE::Component::Client::TCP
Filter
For example, this changes the line separator to a vertical pipe:
Filter => [ "POE::Filter::Line", InputLiteral => "|" ],
Should be:
Filter => [ "POE::Filter::Line", Liter
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 10:56:25AM -0600, Jay Strauss wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like rewrite some forking code to use POE instead.
> >
> > I must connect to a server process via a tcp socket. The messages I
> > receive, are not terminated, but the individual fields are terminated by
an
> > ASCI
ginal Message ---
From: "Jay Strauss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 20:40:12 -0600
Subject: Re: Using POE::Wheel::SocketFactory
> There isn't one, I had to dissect the vendor supplied java client to
> d
Hi,
I get what you say, with
> You could build a list
> of fields until @record == $record_length{$record[0]} or something. At
> that point, you call whatever you've written to handle the record.
I'm working on getting something to process the list in a timely fashion,
but only once all the ele
my ($result,$byte);
>
> while (sysread($s, $byte, 1) == 1) {
> last if ord($byte) == 0;
> $result .= $byte;
> }
> return $result;
> }
>
>
> But I'm trying to figure out how I'd do it with POE::Wheel::SocketFactory +
> POE::W
kerid tickType price/);
}
sub receive {
my $self = shift;
my $s = $self->socket;
my ($result,$byte);
while (sysread($s, $byte, 1) == 1) {
last if ord($byte) == 0;
$result .= $byte;
}
return $result;
}
But I'm trying to figure out how I&#
Forgive my cluelessness.
On Sunday 02 December 2001 07:32 pm, you wrote:
> Is there some kind of event for a connection that goes away gracefully
> without saying "goodbye" in some fashion (TCP)?
It turns out that task lies with my Wheel::ReadWrite and I'm not checking for
write errors there be
ngs up gracefully on my end.
Or did I miss something?
I have:
sub _start {
my( $kernel, $self ) = @_[ KERNEL, OBJECT ];
$kernel->sig('INT', 'signals');
$kernel->alias_set('httpserver');
$self->{wheel} = POE::Wheel::SocketFactory->n
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 09:11:33 -0400 Rocco Caputo wrote:
+--
| On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 10:40:25PM -0600, Chris Fedde wrote:
| > Is it posible for the POE::Wheel::SocketFactory to bind to more than one I
P
| > address or does that reqire multiple factories?
|
| It
On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 09:11:33AM -0400, Rocco Caputo wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 10:40:25PM -0600, Chris Fedde wrote:
> > Is it posible for the POE::Wheel::SocketFactory to bind to more than one IP
> > address or does that reqire multiple factories?
>
> It can if th
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 10:40:25PM -0600, Chris Fedde wrote:
> Is it posible for the POE::Wheel::SocketFactory to bind to more than one IP
> address or does that reqire multiple factories?
It can if they're all on the same subnet. A BindAddress of 10.1.2.0
should bind a socket
Is it posible for the POE::Wheel::SocketFactory to bind to more than one IP
address or does that reqire multiple factories?
thanks
--
Chris Fedde
19 matches
Mail list logo
