vt Ltd
> Reply-To: "POI Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 11 Feb 2004 17:23:03 +0530
> To: POI Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Commits branches and features oh my
>
>> We need to start moving on 3.0 again.
>
> The
> We need to start moving on 3.0 again.
The testcases were initially failing in hpsf (testcase issues) which I
have fixed. The next block was the shared formula stuff that does not
work in 3.0. Jason has put a patch in bugzilla to fix that (very
different from 2.0) .. while I looked at it yet, I a
e, 10 Feb 2004 10:22:51 +1100
> To: "POI Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Commits branches and features oh my
>
> At 10:16 AM 10/02/2004, you wrote:
>> I'd like to propose that we do a 2.5. . . . Oh I know I know
>> we said never again, bu
I'm actually trying to make this work on HEAD at the moment. I promised
the users that they would have this today and they're not brave enough
for 3.0...YET.
I'd like to see the drawing stuff in the "release" branch as well. Your
characterization of that feature set is dead on...so version nu
At 10:16 AM 10/02/2004, you wrote:
I'd like to propose that we do a 2.5. . . . Oh I know I know
we said never again, but this feature is far too mature for 3.0 and far to
sweeping for a 2.01 release in my opinion.
2.1?
Glen Stampoultzis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/gle
Don't forget to add this to 3.0! We need to start moving on 3.0 again. I
need everyone's help to make the HSSF stuff work. There was too much stuff
I didn't work on for me to be able to do it myself.
Lets also get the discussion on TNEF and POIFS2 rolling again.
SuperLink also has a significan
