Am Mo, den 09.08.2004 schrieb Height, Jason um 0:10:
> After 2.5.1 and the copy of the HSSF branch to the head, It would be
> nice to apply the patches that people have been supplying. There are a
> number on the bug list that could be applied, or parts of which could be
> applied.
>
> Thoughts?
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 6 August 2004 10:05 PM
To: POI Developers List
Subject: Re: Plans etc (was Re: [VOTE] POI 2.5.1 release )
At 02:35 PM 5/08/2004, you wrote:
>Ideally the HEAD-based release would contain Glen's latest changes.
>However, if 1. and 2. take too long it woul
ving it out - I'd certailnly feel more comfortable
about it if we could!
Best regards,
Piers
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 August 2004 06:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Response to Rainer WAS: Re: [VOTE
Java and Excel, Got POI?
> From: Glen Stampoultzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "POI Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 22:35:29 +1000
> To: "POI Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Plans etc (was
At 02:35 PM 5/08/2004, you wrote:
Ideally the HEAD-based release would contain Glen's latest changes.
However, if 1. and 2. take too long it would be better to make a 2.5.1
immediately and a 2.6 release later (but not too late).
2.5.1 is essentially good to go as it is so my plan is to put it up.
D
No problems ;-)
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Glen Stampoultzis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 5 August 2004 1:11 PM
To: POI Developers List
Subject: RE: Response to Rainer WAS: Re: [VOTE] POI 2.5.1 release
Alright but you're going to have to buy me a beer when I'
Am Do, den 05.08.2004 schrieb Danny Mui um 1:17:
> The perf branch should still be a target to convert to, but I agree that
> things are stagnating and drifting too far apart.
It seems we have consensus on these items:
1. From the HEAD fork a new "performance branch", say, HSSF_PERF,
containing
way off base here? If my impression is even close to realistic, I'd
> be glad to help with merging changes from REL_2 into HEAD.
>
>
> Regards,
> Chris Wakefield
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Avik Sengupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 08/05/04 10
L PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "POI Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 13:09:24 +1000
> To: "POI Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Response to Rainer WAS: Re: [VOTE] POI 2.5.1 release
>
> At 11:30 AM 5/08/2004,
PM
To: POI Developers List
Subject: RE: Response to Rainer WAS: Re: [VOTE] POI 2.5.1 release
At 11:30 AM 5/08/2004, you wrote:
>Glen
>
>Ok done.
>
>I think that there is some agreement to move the 2.5 branch of HSSF
over
>to the HEAD, maybe then another release (2.6?) with the HPSF co
+1 to all of below, If you take the lead on this ;-)
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Glen Stampoultzis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:39 PM
To: POI Developers List
Subject: RE: Response to Rainer WAS: Re: [VOTE] POI 2.5.1 release
At 11:30 AM 5/08/2004, you
At 11:30 AM 5/08/2004, you wrote:
Glen
Ok done.
I think that there is some agreement to move the 2.5 branch of HSSF over
to the HEAD, maybe then another release (2.6?) with the HPSF could be
done. Hopefully this could all be done fairly quickly.
Yes. I think we can say that we have consensus on
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 5 August 2004 10:52 AM
To: POI Developers List
Subject: RE: Response to Rainer WAS: Re: [VOTE] POI 2.5.1 release
I really can't see a reason to delay 2.5.1 so unless you want to veto I'd
really like to release it.
The whole merge of branch and head is another
+0
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Glen Stampoultzis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 12:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] POI 2.5.1 release
I've collected a bunch of changes together and created a maintenance
release.
A preview copy may be found her
: Response to Rainer WAS: Re: [VOTE] POI 2.5.1 release
I understand your concerns. It is also unfair to hold your work up.
Initially I thought I'd be given a greater amount of time to do the HSSF
refactoring, but its not looking promising and HSSF isn't stable in the
head. Therefor
"
To:
POI Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:
Plans etc (was Re: [VOTE] POI 2.5.1 release )
Glen,
Thanks for setting the agenda.
I agree that no. 4. isnt really an option.
Option 1 is getting more and more difficult each day. Till about the 2.5
delivery, most chang
pta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
08/05/04 10:40 AM
Please respond to "POI Developers List"
To:
POI Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:
Plans etc (was Re: [VOTE] POI 2.5.1 release )
Glen,
Thanks for setting the agenda.
I agree that no. 4. isnt really an optio
]
Subject: Response to Rainer WAS: Re: [VOTE] POI 2.5.1 release
I understand your concerns. It is also unfair to hold your work up.
Initially I thought I'd be given a greater amount of time to do the HSSF
refactoring, but its not looking promising and HSSF isn't stable in the
head. Th
Glen,
Thanks for setting the agenda.
I agree that no. 4. isnt really an option.
Option 1 is getting more and more difficult each day. Till about the 2.5
delivery, most changes were getting backported. But I think some recent
fixes havent been. And I think it is infeasible to expect outside
co
poultzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "POI Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 21:16:49 +1000
> To: "POI Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] POI 2.5.1 release
>
> At 04:40 PM 4/08/2004, yo
TECTED]>
> Organization: Rainer Klute IT-Consulting GmbH
> Reply-To: "POI Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 08:40:17 +0200
> To: POI Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] POI 2.5.1 release
>=20
> On Wed, 2
lting GmbH
> Reply-To: "POI Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 08:40:17 +0200
> To: POI Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] POI 2.5.1 release
>=20
> On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 07:31, Glen Stampoultzis wrote:
>> I
+1
-Original Message-
From: Glen Stampoultzis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 12:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] POI 2.5.1 release
I've collected a bunch of changes together and created a maintenance
release.
A preview copy may be found here:
htt
At 04:40 PM 4/08/2004, you wrote:
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 07:31, Glen Stampoultzis wrote:
> I've collected a bunch of changes together and created a maintenance
release.
Glen, first of all thank you for your changes and your effort to create
a maintenance release!
> This does not include any change
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 07:31, Glen Stampoultzis wrote:
> I've collected a bunch of changes together and created a maintenance release.
Glen, first of all thank you for your changes and your effort to create
a maintenance release!
> This does not include any changes being made in the head.
I don'
25 matches
Mail list logo
