On Jun 16, 2008, at 3:53 PM, Jim Wright wrote:
> My wife is having a problem with some folks she emails not being
> able to mail her back. This is now MY problem. :)
>
> If I'm reading the config file correctly, WHITELISTSENDER=1 is what
> I need to do, so that an
My wife is having a problem with some folks she emails not being able
to mail her back. This is now MY problem. :)
If I'm reading the config file correctly, WHITELISTSENDER=1 is what I
need to do, so that anyone she emails will automatically get added to
a whitelist? I know that spammers
On Jun 10, 2008, at 7:23 PM, Hugo Monteiro wrote:
> Recently i've been receiving quite a lot of spam, from different
> places,
> with a common denominator. The helo presented by the connecting
> "server"
> is in the form of SPK.localdomain. This is most likely
> caused by
> infected workstat
On Feb 8, 2008, at 11:37 AM, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
> Lately i have seen a LOT of SPAM resending with almost exact 10
> minutes of difference. For example:
>
> Feb 3 07:51:06 hermes policyd: rcpt=876, greylist=new,
> host=117.6.120.63 (unknown), [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Aug 24, 2007, at 8:43 AM, Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
> Cami Sardinha wrote:
>> Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
>>> Since there is not yet (is this planned?) SPF support to policyd,
>>> does
>>> someone here has a good idea for spf policy server for postfix ?
>>
>> This functionality will not be built in
I've had this thought in the back of my head for a while, but don't
have the knowledge to pull it off. I have several spamtrap addresses
on two different domains I host here. Generally these are just
seeded from hidden email links on web pages, and for the most part
these do block a fair