Dear port maintainers,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more
unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity
to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this po
Quoting Piotr Smyrak :
On Thu, 04 Apr 2024 00:30:41 -0700
Chris wrote:
I do all of my development in jails. As such I have no use for
poudriere(8). But an attempt to build editors/vscode threw the
following:
The limit imposed by poudriere(8) for the maximum number of files
allowed to be
open
On 2024-04-04 09:07, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
> hint using jail is not it, poudriere
> leverages jails, but we could do without jail while providing the same
> value.
Not if it imposes itself.
It does not. The complexity of keeping such a huge number of
interdepend ports/packages building and r
On 2024-04-04 03:43, Michael Gmelin wrote:
On 4. Apr 2024, at 09:31, Chris wrote:
I do all of my development in jails. As such I have no use for
poudriere(8).
But an attempt to build editors/vscode threw the following:
The limit imposed by poudriere(8) for the maximum number of files allowe
On 2024-04-04 00:46, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 04/04/24 09:30, Chris wrote:
I do all of my development in jails. As such I have no use for
poudriere(8).
But an attempt to build editors/vscode threw the following:
The limit imposed by poudriere(8) for the maximum number of files allowed
to be
ope
Yasuhiro Kimura writes:
> 1. Make clean install of 14.0-RELEASE amd64.
> 2. Login as root
> 3. pkg install git-tiny
Since you didn't already have pkg, it was bootstrapped here, and marked
it as non-automatic.
> 4. cd /usr/ports
> 5. git clone https://git.freebsd.org/ports.git .
> 6. pkg delete -
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 2:28 PM Yasuhiro Kimura wrote:
>
> I tried following steps.
> ...
> 6. pkg delete -afy
Eh? Why did you do that?
This probably removed pkg that you bootstrapped earlier and then
reinstalled it from ports which changed the automatic flag value (my
guess).
Hi!
> > hint using jail is not it, poudriere
> > leverages jails, but we could do without jail while providing the same
> > value.
> Not if it imposes itself.
It does not. The complexity of keeping such a huge number of
interdepend ports/packages building and running is not imposed
by poudriere,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 1:27 PM Yasuhiro Kimura wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I tried following steps.
>
> 1. Make clean install of 14.0-RELEASE amd64.
> 2. Login as root
> 3. pkg install git-tiny
> 4. cd /usr/ports
> 5. git clone https://git.freebsd.org/ports.git .
> 6. pkg delete -afy
> 7. cd security/su
On 2024-04-04 00:41, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu 04 Apr 00:30, Chris wrote:
I do all of my development in jails. As such I have no use for
poudriere(8).
I stopped reading here, because it clearly shows you haven't understand at
all
what value poudriere(8) is bringing,
It appears you've
Hello,
I tried following steps.
1. Make clean install of 14.0-RELEASE amd64.
2. Login as root
3. pkg install git-tiny
4. cd /usr/ports
5. git clone https://git.freebsd.org/ports.git .
6. pkg delete -afy
7. cd security/sudo (Probably any other ports are OK expect ports-mgmt/pkg)
8. make install
9.
> On 4. Apr 2024, at 09:31, Chris wrote:
>
> I do all of my development in jails. As such I have no use for poudriere(8).
> But an attempt to build editors/vscode threw the following:
>
> The limit imposed by poudriere(8) for the maximum number of files allowed to
> be
> opened by a jail (de
On Thu, 04 Apr 2024 00:30:41 -0700
Chris wrote:
> I do all of my development in jails. As such I have no use for
> poudriere(8). But an attempt to build editors/vscode threw the
> following:
>
> The limit imposed by poudriere(8) for the maximum number of files
> allowed to be
> opened by a jail
Hi Chris,
On 4/4/24 01:30AM, Chris wrote:
limitations, or poudriere at all? How can I just build a package. Users
(or Maintainers) aren't forced to use poudriere, are they?
Unfortunately, yes. Yes, we are. That or packages (which is lacking due
to non-existent build options.) For me, Poudrier
On 04/04/24 09:30, Chris wrote:
I do all of my development in jails. As such I have no use for
poudriere(8).
But an attempt to build editors/vscode threw the following:
The limit imposed by poudriere(8) for the maximum number of files
allowed to be
opened by a jail (default 1024) is exceeded
On Thu, 04 Apr 2024 00:30:41 -0700
Chris wrote:
> I do all of my development in jails. As such I have no use for poudriere(8).
> But an attempt to build editors/vscode threw the following:
>
> The limit imposed by poudriere(8) for the maximum number of files allowed to
> be
> opened by a jail (
On Thu 04 Apr 00:30, Chris wrote:
> I do all of my development in jails. As such I have no use for poudriere(8).
I stopped reading here, because it clearly shows you haven't understand at all
what value poudriere(8) is bringing, hint using jail is not it, poudriere
leverages jails, but we could do
I do all of my development in jails. As such I have no use for poudriere(8).
But an attempt to build editors/vscode threw the following:
The limit imposed by poudriere(8) for the maximum number of files allowed to
be
opened by a jail (default 1024) is exceeded during the build of vscode.
To suc
18 matches
Mail list logo
