Re: GD in 3.9

2006-05-19 Thread Keith Matthews
On Thu, 18 May 2006 15:47:19 -0400 Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 18 May 2006 21:32:15 +0300 Liviu Daia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > How is it useful? (Hint: you can't talk about utility outside a > > context. Useful to whom, for what purpose, with what costs?) > > And here

Re: GD in 3.9

2006-05-19 Thread Rod.. Whitworth
On Fri, 19 May 2006 08:48:52 +0100, Keith Matthews wrote: >As to the inclusion of X in everything - there have been statements >that "it has been decided" - decided by whom ? - I've seen no discussion >of the matter on this list. This is not a democracy. That is probably, outside the competence

Re: GD in 3.9

2006-05-19 Thread Lars Hansson
On Friday 19 May 2006 15:48, Keith Matthews wrote: > As to the inclusion of X in everything - there have been statements > that "it has been decided" - decided by whom ? - I've seen no discussion > of the matter on this list. A discussion is not necessasry for a decision to be made. --- Lars Han

Re: GD in 3.9

2006-05-19 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Thu, May 18, 2006 at 11:24:42PM +0300, Liviu Daia said that > > what is the utility in that? > > To start a debate. At this point (7 month after the fact), a polite > message would have never accomplished that. Did I succeed? Yes: > several people have expressed their views. there

Re: GD in 3.9

2006-05-19 Thread Liviu Daia
On 19 May 2006, sand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daniel Hartmeier wrote: > > While testing pfstat, I noticed that FreeBSD's port of gd 2.0.33 > > [1] has a WITHOUT_X11 "flavor". It does pull in freetype2, but that > > doesn't depend on X11 there. > > I've tried to add a 'no_x11' FLAVOR, can somebo

www.cacasubmarina.com ________\__ Projecto Ca�aSubmarina

2006-05-19 Thread Ca�aSubmarina
Regista-te Participa Projecto CaçaSubmarina WWW.CACASUBMARINA.COM PORTUGAL

Re: GD in 3.9

2006-05-19 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Fri, 19 May 2006, Liviu Daia wrote: > On 19 May 2006, sand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Daniel Hartmeier wrote: > > > While testing pfstat, I noticed that FreeBSD's port of gd 2.0.33 > > > [1] has a WITHOUT_X11 "flavor". It does pull in freetype2, but that > > > doesn't depend on X11 there.

Re: GD in 3.9

2006-05-19 Thread Liviu Daia
On 19 May 2006, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 19 May 2006, Liviu Daia wrote: > > > On 19 May 2006, sand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Daniel Hartmeier wrote: > > > > While testing pfstat, I noticed that FreeBSD's port of gd 2.0.33 > > > > [1] has a WITHOUT_X11 "flavor". It

Re: NEW: lang/chicken

2006-05-19 Thread Deanna Phillips
"Tan Dang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 5/6/06, Deanna Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> steven mestdagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > this doesn't build on my sparc64, no meaningful error, i might >> > be short on memory - can anyone else try this? >> >> Hmm, NetBSD has this in the

Re: NEW: lang/chicken

2006-05-19 Thread steven mestdagh
Deanna Phillips [2006-05-19, 12:14:18]: > "Tan Dang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On 5/6/06, Deanna Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> steven mestdagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> > this doesn't build on my sparc64, no meaningful error, i might > >> > be short on memory - can a

3.9-stable subversion, dependencies fail to build

2006-05-19 Thread Chad M Stewart
Am I doing something wrong? # pwd /usr/ports/devel/subversion # make install ===> Checking files for subversion-1.3.0 `/usr/ports/distfiles/subversion-1.3.0.tar.gz' is up to date. >> Checksum OK for subversion-1.3.0.tar.gz. (sha1) ===> subversion-1.3.0 depends on: python-2.3.5p3 - not found ===

Re: 3.9-stable subversion, dependencies fail to build

2006-05-19 Thread marius
On 5/19/06, Chad M Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Am I doing something wrong? # pwd /usr/ports/devel/subversion # make install ===> Checking files for subversion-1.3.0 `/usr/ports/distfiles/subversion-1.3.0.tar.gz' is up to date. >> Checksum OK for subversion-1.3.0.tar.gz. (sha1) ===> s

Re: 3.9-stable subversion, dependencies fail to build

2006-05-19 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 02:22:32PM -0400, Chad M Stewart wrote: > Am I doing something wrong? > /usr/ports/x11/tk/8.4/w-tk-8.4.7/tk8.4.7/generic/tk.h:96:29: X11/ > Xlib.h: No such file or directory you need to install X. -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: 3.9-stable subversion, dependencies fail to build

2006-05-19 Thread Chad M Stewart
On May 19, 2006, at 2:52 PM, marius wrote: On 5/19/06, Chad M Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Am I doing something wrong? # pwd /usr/ports/devel/subversion # make install ===> Checking files for subversion-1.3.0 `/usr/ports/distfiles/subversion-1.3.0.tar.gz' is up to date. >> Checksum

PATCH: better kde mirrors

2006-05-19 Thread Jim Razmus
Patch swaps out rutgers (not on the kde ftp mirror list) for oregonstate. Also replaces ftp.informatik.hu-berlin.de (has most files but they are "marked unretrievable" for months now) with another German mirror ftp.fu-berlin.de. Fixes roughly 140 and 130 download failures respectively. Jim Index

ftp.[usa.]openbsd.org mirroring distfiles

2006-05-19 Thread Jim Razmus
What is the criteria for OpenBSD mirroring ports distfiles? I ask because my most recent port survey found ftp.usa.openbsd.org missing 410 files and ftp.openbsd.org missing 117 files for the -current ports tree. I can provide a detailed list of ports and files that are missing if it's useful. Th

Re: new: devel/p5-IO-KQueue

2006-05-19 Thread marius
On 5/18/06, steven mestdagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Srebrenko Sehic [2006-05-18, 13:33:38]: > Attached is a port of p5-IO-KQueue. Tested on i386/-current. Works fine. > > $ cat pkg/DESCR > > This module provides a fairly low level interface to the BSD kqueue > system call, allowing you to moni

Re: update: www/p5-libwww

2006-05-19 Thread marius
On 5/18/06, Srebrenko Sehic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Attached bumps www/p5-libwww to the latest version from CPAN (5.508). Tested on i386/-current. Passes regressions tests. $MAINTAINER timed-out. Builds fine on i386/-current at my end too. //mts

Re: 3.9-stable subversion, dependencies fail to build

2006-05-19 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 07:56:53PM -0400, Chad M Stewart wrote: > Interesting. For kicks I tried, 'FLAVOR="no_bindings" make package' > and it worked. To be honest I'm not sure what that changed. because the no_bindings FLAVOR doesn't depend on python. the "GENERIC" python port has a BUILD_

Re: 3.9-stable subversion, dependencies fail to build

2006-05-19 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 07:56:53PM -0400, Chad M Stewart wrote: > >>/usr/ports/devel/subversion > >># make install > I don't put X on my servers. but you'll run tens, hundreds, thousands of commands as root, and likely install packages which will only be used to build the packages you want, when