Incident Information:-
Database: d:/lotus/domino/data/mail1.box
Originator: ports@openbsd.org
Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Urkaampigtivz
Date/Time: 08/28/2006 10:14:08 PM
The file attachment mail.zip you sent to the recipients listed above was
infected with the W32/[EMAIL PROTECT
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:55:00AM +0200, Adriaan wrote:
> >gtk+2 and gimp compiled ok with your patches on a fresh installed
> >2006-8-28 snapshot system using the ports.tar.gz of the same date. The
> >box is now compiling gnome and that will take a while ;)
> >
> Nikolaj,
>
> I can confirm your
On 8/29/06, Adriaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/28/06, Mikolaj Kucharski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 04:17:51AM +0100, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 03:15:47AM +0100, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 04:20:12PM +0200, Adria
On Tuesday 29 August 2006 04:09, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> It's a three-man team, actually.
Oh, that makes it ok then. No wait, it is still annoying and stupid.
> What are you going to do? (Mind you I'll show
> these mails to the police if something happens.)
Considering that the worst thing that
On Tuesday 29 August 2006 03:49, Bachman Kharazmi wrote:
> The reported version is too old, the bug is very likely fixed in a
> more recent version. Please upgrade to 1.5.2
Whatever the cause of the problem is, it has not been fixed in 1.5.2. koshell
still gets a signal 11 when launched from the
On 8/28/06, Mikolaj Kucharski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 04:17:51AM +0100, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 03:15:47AM +0100, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 04:20:12PM +0200, Adriaan Misc wrote:
> > > Under Gnome gimp dumps core on s
On Monday 21 August 2006 7:26 am, you wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm having some trouble compiling 1.5 jdk with the aug. 16 snapshots. It
> complains about missing ZoneInfoMappings. Details below.
>
> Any advice on how to proceed?
Actually the missing ZoneInfoMappings is ok, but the NPE
is not. It seem
Apparently you aren't able to see the difference between a threat and a "do
not use our lists for your shit" statement. Let me try to clear it up a little.
Nobody, and I mean nobody, involved in OpenBSD cares about whatever crap you
do. We don't like your attitude. We don't like the way you beh
Tobias Ulmer wrote:
ports have so many disadvantages.
You might need the ports tree even when only using packages.
ex: /usr/ports/infrastructure/out-of-date
I wish there was another way to check for outdated ports but there's none.
--
Antoine
> >Quite frankly, we are sick of him.
>
> Oooh, how cute, now you're threatening me?
Oooh, how cute, you're still lacking a clue.
> What are you going to do? (Mind you I'll show
> these mails to the police if something happens.)
Good idea. They deserve to have a laugh at your expense, too.
On Monday 28 August 2006 3:15 pm, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> I hope people who want control back start using the MirPorts
> Framework.
Can you stop advertising your fork of OpenBSD on our lists
please? It is getting quite annoying and you've been asked
before to stop.
Theo de Raadt dixit:
>Thorsten, will you stop self-advertising yourself (and your one-man
It's a three-man team, actually.
>As an OpenBSD developer, I am continually offended by your presence
>here, and it makes me not want to do development, so I urge the
>community to solve the problem of him
-- Forwarded message --
From: Thomas Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 28 Aug 2006 19:36:43 -
Subject: [Bug 133089] signal 11 caused at startup
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
http:
sorry, I didn't mention that it's 3.9 release I'm on.
/bkw
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 08:22:56PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2006/08/28 20:59, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 06:08:25PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > > Jack J. Woehr dixit:
> > >
> > > > 2) It's compressed on the dist cd's (look for ports.tgz and
> > > > un
> >Why?
>
> A little consistency never hurts (src.tar.gz and srcsys.tar.gz too).
>
> >ports have so many disadvantages.
>
> Yeah, sure. If OpenBSD would start to ship incomplete ports,
> I hope people who want control back start using the MirPorts
> Framework.
Ok, I've had enough. I have to sp
Tobias Ulmer dixit:
>Why?
A little consistency never hurts (src.tar.gz and srcsys.tar.gz too).
>ports have so many disadvantages.
Yeah, sure. If OpenBSD would start to ship incomplete ports,
I hope people who want control back start using the MirPorts
Framework.
//mirabile
--
I believe no one
On 2006/08/28 20:59, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 06:08:25PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > Jack J. Woehr dixit:
> >
> > > 2) It's compressed on the dist cd's (look for ports.tgz and unzip in
> > > /usr (UNLIKE src.tgz WHICH UNZIPS IN /usr/src WATCH YOUR REAR END ON THIS
> >
On 8/28/06, Tobias Ulmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 06:08:25PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
What maybe would be a good idea is to ship a ports-tree-light version
that includes ports that can't be build as package for various reasons.
Dependencies should then be fetch
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 08:59:27PM +0200, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 06:08:25PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > Jack J. Woehr dixit:
> >
> > > 2) It's compressed on the dist cd's (look for ports.tgz and unzip in
> > > /usr (UNLIKE src.tgz WHICH UNZIPS IN /usr/src WATCH YOUR
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 06:08:25PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Jack J. Woehr dixit:
>
> > 2) It's compressed on the dist cd's (look for ports.tgz and unzip in
> > /usr (UNLIKE src.tgz WHICH UNZIPS IN /usr/src WATCH YOUR REAR END ON THIS
> > LATTER ONE)
>
> In MirOS, the source tarballs un
Jack J. Woehr dixit:
> 2) It's compressed on the dist cd's (look for ports.tgz and unzip in
> /usr (UNLIKE src.tgz WHICH UNZIPS IN /usr/src WATCH YOUR REAR END ON THIS
> LATTER ONE)
In MirOS, the source tarballs unzip in / - all of them.
Maybe OpenBSD wants to adopt this?
//mirabile
--
I
On Aug 28, 2006, at 9:40 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi:
Just wondering if you could help me. I'm fairly new to OpenBSD and
I don't
have the ports folder on my pc (/usr/ports). Can someone tell me
How I can
get this folder, do I have to run setup again?
Fred --
Three answers:
1) The
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi:
>
> Just wondering if you could help me. I'm fairly new to OpenBSD and I don't
> have the ports folder on my pc (/usr/ports). Can someone tell me How I can
> get this folder, do I have to run setup again?
http://cvs.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#Ports
> Thanks in ad
On 8/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Fred.
have the ports folder on my pc (/usr/ports). Can someone tell me How I can
There should be a file called ports.tar.gz on your CD or
ftp to your favorite OpenBSD mirror, grep ports.tar.gz for your
OpenBSD and untar it.
Its a good i
Hi:
Just wondering if you could help me. I'm fairly new to OpenBSD and I don't
have the ports folder on my pc (/usr/ports). Can someone tell me How I can
get this folder, do I have to run setup again?
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Fred Schnittke MCSE, MCP,
Network Administrator
VETER
I donno what you are talking about. But what I can hear is that you've
never reported a bug in bugs.kde.org.
I've mentioned that it's openbsd pkgs I've used. and the version of koffice.
/bkw
On 28/08/06, Adriaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/28/06, Bachman Kharazmi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/28/06, Bachman Kharazmi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone experienced the bug I've reported here
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133089 with obsd koffice package?
Don't you think a report without mentioning:
- the OBSD version
- whether you compiled from ports
- whether you used binar
On Monday 28 August 2006 17:21, Bachman Kharazmi wrote:
> Anyone experienced the bug I've reported here
> http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133089 with obsd koffice package?
Yes but interestingly enough koshell works if started in a terminal window (ie
konsole or xterm).
---
Lars Hansson
>Anyone experienced the bug I've reported here
>http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133089 with obsd koffice package?
Yup, similar stuff here. KWord, KSpread, KPresenter, etc work but KOffice
Workspace crashes on start
Anyone experienced the bug I've reported here
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133089 with obsd koffice package?
--
/bkw
31 matches
Mail list logo
