On Thursday 12 April 2007 12:39:43 Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> STeve Andre' wrote on Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 10:04:06AM -0400:
> > On Thursday 12 April 2007 09:31:47 Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> >> Josh Grosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Originally submitted in January. Now, with:
> >>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 05:27:10PM +0100, Mark Lumsden wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> tested on i386 only.
>>
>> comments/ok?
> come on, please give a bit more information... quote DESCR for example.
> but this is just a bit too skinny..
>
>>
>> - mark
>
>
> --
> ``This statement is false''
> NedBSD: http:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 05:27:10PM +0100, Mark Lumsden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> tested on i386 only.
>
> comments/ok?
come on, please give a bit more information... quote DESCR for example.
but this is just a bit too skinny..
>
> - mark
--
``This statement is false''
NedBSD: http://nedbsd.eu
Il dott Paret e il suo staff a grande richiesta vi da
appuntamento a Milano con il corso
>> QUANTUM EXTREME <> PNL 3 Pratica il 25 Aprile <<
>> BUSINESS: seminario Vendita Persuasiva il 28 Aprile <<
>> IPNOSI: Ipnostage data 29 aprile dalle 10 alle 18 ( quota da 99 euro)
<<
sconto allievi a 69 eu
Hi,
tested on i386 only.
comments/ok?
- mark
twap-0.4.tgz
Description: application/gzip-compressed
Hi Steve,
STeve Andre' wrote on Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 10:04:06AM -0400:
> On Thursday 12 April 2007 09:31:47 Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>> Josh Grosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Originally submitted in January. Now, with:
>>>
>>> ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= amd64 i386 armish
>>>
>>> as it had been co
Just as an FYI: I went to go revisit this via our internal ticket system
and found that the 5.4 binaries from an experimental unofficial
port/package someone sent me have been running fine and stable without
segfaults for 4+ months.
I highly recommend that the port maintainers consider bringi
On Thursday 12 April 2007 09:31:47 Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Josh Grosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Originally submitted in January. Now, with:
> >
> > ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= amd64 i386 armish
> >
> > as it had been confirmed to run on those platforms, and would not run
> > on sparc64, nor on
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 01:31:47PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> It also dies with an alignment error on alpha (in regress).
>
> How about actually fixing the code rather than slapping on a list
> of archs where this accidentally happens to run?
I would, Naddy, If I knew what to fix.
I
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
How about actually fixing the code rather than slapping on a list
of archs where this accidentally happens to run?
+1
--
Antoine
Josh Grosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Originally submitted in January. Now, with:
>
> ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= amd64 i386 armish
>
> as it had been confirmed to run on those platforms, and would not run
> on sparc64, nor on vax.
It also dies with an alignment error on alpha (in regress).
How
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 05:15:09PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> zaurus/armish use the same binaries.
Thank you, Stuart. Diff follows.
--- Makefile.orig Wed Apr 11 09:35:51 2007
+++ MakefileThu Apr 12 09:39:29 2007
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# $OpenBSD$
SHARED_ONLY= Yes
-ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=
12 matches
Mail list logo