Hi Sebastian,
It would seem they updated the port to 2.0.0.16 today.
Hope that helps.
Hi everybody,
this is no request nor bagging.
I just read a lot about FF3 and the chance getting it imported.
Still I'd like to point out that FF 2.0.16 is out and I'd like to know if
FF2 gets updated or if the focus is on FF3 (wich also was updated by
mozilla recently).
If there are FF2 patches
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 04:02:59PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I'll be fairly surprised if this is actually correct, but at least
> it builds and appears to display the right addresses and port numbers.
>
> "mkdir patches" before applying..
Works fine from my limited tests. A single capture
joshua stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm already annoyed that I have to unconfigure Theo's xterm
> > preferences on OpenBSD so I get the default behavior back.
>
> like what?
XTerm*deleteIsDEL: false
XTerm*scrollBar:false
XTerm*pointerMode: 1
--
Christian "naddy" Weisg
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 03:30:16PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have been playing with FF3 and I'd have to say that minus the speedup
> > overall the browser took a step backwards. What particularly ticked me
> > off was:
> > * outlook li
On 15/07/2008, Martynas Venckus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the best way to handle this was suggested by pval, a while
> ago. Import it (www/mozilla-firefox3, or www/mozilla-firefox-devel),
> but not link to the builds yet.
>
> When we decide it's stable enough, reimport as www/mozill
On 15/07/2008, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wouldn't oppose having both versions in tree
I agree; one other reason to keep multiple versions of each
web-browser is so that web-developers could easily test their pages in
multiple browsers, ensuring compatibility across rendering
On Thursday 17 July 2008 10:04:30 am Brad wrote:
> On Thursday 17 July 2008 09:09:35 Okan Demirmen wrote:
> > one important note is to make sure the sqlite3 update doesn't cause
> > regressions in other ports...
>
> A bulk build has already been done. With the exception of sqlitebrowser the
> rest
> Actually, I much prefer that cross-platform applications retain
> their defaults across different platforms.
i agree for the most part. i don't think we should be changing
icons or tweaking default settings just because most of us like
them, except in cases where those default settings don't ma
At 02:27 PM 7/17/2008 +0200, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
Hello!
[Mailing list changed to ports@, where this belongs.]
Confirmed.
The package has been *split*. There's, for example on my system,
git-1.5.6.1, which does *NOT* require X at all, git-svn-1.5.6.1 (does
*NOT* require X either), and git
Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * While trying to make FF3 a better browser for OpenBSD we might as well
> set plugin.default_plugin_disabled = false to remove the annoying
> message that scrolls down your screen at snails pace asking if you
> want to install a friggin non-exist
Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been playing with FF3 and I'd have to say that minus the speedup
> overall the browser took a step backwards. What particularly ticked me
> off was:
> * outlook like popup in the right-hand corner to notify that a
> download completed (now the
On Thursday 17 July 2008 09:09:35 Okan Demirmen wrote:
> one important note is to make sure the sqlite3 update doesn't cause
> regressions in other ports...
A bulk build has already been done. With the exception of sqlitebrowser the
rest looks good and there is a patch to fix the situation with sq
On Tue 2008.07.15 at 14:54 -0400, Brad wrote:
> Has anyone actually tested FF2 with newer NSPR/NSS to make sure there
> are no compatability issues?
i'm running FF2 with the newer NSPR/NSS and sqlite3 on amd64 - will
report regressions.
one important note is to make sure the sqlite3 update doesn'
Update to latest version, some bugs fixed and support for other printers
added.
Full Changelog avaliable at http://foo2zjs.rkkda.com/ChangeLog
Port tested @amd64 with a Hp2600n printer.
Cheers
Giovanni
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file
Hello!
[Mailing list changed to ports@, where this belongs.]
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:41:24PM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
>[...]
>Yes, I DO get it,
Not completely.
>[...]
>As the maintainer explained some time ago, there has been a no-X11 version
>of GIT since April, so the question is, rea
Martynas Venckus wrote:
Hey,
I've updated the diff.
Changes:
- security update to 3.0.1
- fix the ssl psm bug. you can't just cast a char* to an
int* and access through it
- fix arm endianness issue (armel abi)
- strict alignment fixes for sparc64
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, jared r r spiegel wrote:
> cranky old OCR engine that apparently sucks less than most
> other ones out there ??. friend of mine asked for it in response
> to seeing something on groklaw where they used it with image-based PDFs
> and xpdf or something to snarf the text
17 July 2008 г. 13:30:43 Federico G. Schwindt wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 01:10:37PM +0400, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> > 17 July 2008 ?. 01:13:14 David Hill wrote:
> > > If you use pidgin w/ OTR, please test.
> >
> > Tested slightly on i386, packages and works okay there. Also tested
> > libotr wit
17 July 2008 г. 01:13:14 David Hill wrote:
> If you use pidgin w/ OTR, please test.
Tested slightly on i386, packages and works okay there. Also tested
libotr with kopete-otr (uncommitted due to lack of interested of anyone
here), no regressions seen.
--
Best wishes,
Vadim Zhukov
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 13:58 -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> * I'd also like to get the old icons back. The new ones are not only
> ugly they are fuzzy as well. I also liked them better before when
> they were the right size. The new version the icons are basically
> touching the frame they
21 matches
Mail list logo
