Thank you.
Understandable.
2009/10/6 Daniel Bolgheroni
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Alexander Bubnov wrote:
>
> > Yes. Like that - BSD community. I do not think it is Utopia. I think at
> > first there is a need to discussed some general aims and rules which
> helps
> > to resolve difference opinions.
So how cool would it be to add tcl to base? Seriously, bsd liscense,
small footprint, knock off lots off depencies for ports
Ok, crawlng back into my hole
On 2009/10/06 12:14, David Coppa wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2009/10/06 11:18, David Coppa wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Stuart Henderson
> >> wrote:
> >> > been in a bulk build - ok?
> >>
> >> Is tcl now a build dependency even with th
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Alexander Bubnov wrote:
> Yes. Like that - BSD community. I do not think it is Utopia. I think at
> first there is a need to discussed some general aims and rules which helps
> to resolve difference opinions. Then do common work together.
> For example (below just alphabeticall
On Tuesday 06 October 2009 11:22:41 Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> > On 6 Oct 2009, at 15:20, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > > On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Vincent Gross wrote:
> > > > Hi folks,
> > > >
> > > > here is a diff that splits ocaml in three packages
> > >
>
On Tuesday 06 October 2009 01:52:47 Benoit Lecocq wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This diff updates imapproxy to the release 1.2.6.
> Tested on amd64/sparc64.
> "it seems to be ok" from the current maintainer.
>
> Comments ? OK ?
>
> Cheers,
> benoit
I didn't push for this being commited because it had an issue
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 06:27:33PM +0200, Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:40:40PM +0200, Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I updated Dovecot to the latest version (1.2.1), added support for
> > Managesieve and removed the old cmusieve plugin (now it's the dove
On Tuesday 06 October 2009 15:15:34 Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:38:32PM -0400, STeve Andre' wrote:
> > On Tuesday 06 October 2009 02:32:06 Edd Barrett wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 09:47:07PM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> > > > Edd, can you reproduce my claim on your
Hi
I tried to build the ads Flavor on sparc64, too and it worked. I used
Windows 7 as a Client for Samba 3.4.1 on OpenBSD/sparc64 as a DC and
everything works. Great!
Regards
René
--
René Maroufi
i...@maroufi.net
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:38:32PM -0400, STeve Andre' wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 October 2009 02:32:06 Edd Barrett wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 09:47:07PM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> > > Edd, can you reproduce my claim on your latest version of MPlayer?
> >
> > It plays the video fine here
Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:06:37PM -0500, Matthew Weigel wrote:
>> Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote:
>>
You must be very carefull if you want to try this update !
>> I think this information should get wider distribution; I would
>> favor something in MESSAGE-server l
stop to jeer!
let's finish this discussion.
2009/10/6 Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 09:08:51PM +0400, Alexander Bubnov wrote:
> > 2009/10/6 Theo de Raadt
> >
> > > > Probably I am going to ask a stupid question but it is very
> interesting
> > > for
> > > > me. Because I
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 09:08:51PM +0400, Alexander Bubnov wrote:
> 2009/10/6 Theo de Raadt
>
> > > Probably I am going to ask a stupid question but it is very interesting
> > for
> > > me. Because I would like to help BSD projects.
> > > Why OpenBSD does not use pkgsrc of NetBSD project as defau
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:06:37PM -0500, Matthew Weigel wrote:
> Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote:
>
> >>You must be very carefull if you want to try this update !
>
> I think this information should get wider distribution; I would
> favor something in MESSAGE-server linking to
> http://wiki.dovecot.
I wanted to say I need to know much more.
2009/10/6 Alexander Bubnov
> I agree with you I need much more.
>
> 2009/10/6 Theo de Raadt
>
>> > > > Probably I am going to ask a stupid question but it is very
>> interesting
>> > > for
>> > > > me. Because I would like to help BSD projects.
>> > > >
I am sorry,
Thank you for clarification.
2009/10/6 Predrag Punosevac
> > On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:12:34PM +0400, Alexander Bubnov wrote:
> > I am sorry. Really, I don't want to have support here. I just would like
> to
> > know relationship between pkgsrc and original OpenBSD port system.
>
>
I agree with you I need much more.
2009/10/6 Theo de Raadt
> > > > Probably I am going to ask a stupid question but it is very
> interesting
> > > for
> > > > me. Because I would like to help BSD projects.
> > > > Why OpenBSD does not use pkgsrc of NetBSD project as default ports? I
> > > guess
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:12:34PM +0400, Alexander Bubnov wrote:
> I am sorry. Really, I don't want to have support here. I just would like to
> know relationship between pkgsrc and original OpenBSD port system.
There is NO relationship! NetBSD didn't have pkgsrc when Theo forked
OpenBSD. Open
2009/10/6 Theo de Raadt
> > Probably I am going to ask a stupid question but it is very interesting
> for
> > me. Because I would like to help BSD projects.
> > Why OpenBSD does not use pkgsrc of NetBSD project as default ports? I
> guess
> > work can be faster in case port system is shared betwe
> > > Probably I am going to ask a stupid question but it is very interesting
> > for
> > > me. Because I would like to help BSD projects.
> > > Why OpenBSD does not use pkgsrc of NetBSD project as default ports? I
> > guess
> > > work can be faster in case port system is shared between BSD project
Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote:
You must be very carefull if you want to try this update !
I think this information should get wider distribution; I would favor
something in MESSAGE-server linking to
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Upgrading/1.2 - it's too late for people
following -current, but it wo
> I am sorry. Really, I don't want to have support here. I just would like to
> know relationship between pkgsrc and original OpenBSD port system.
A lot of English is spoken in India because the British used to be there
a long time ago.
How does it change anything if you "know the relationship"?
I am sorry. Really, I don't want to have support here. I just would like to
know relationship between pkgsrc and original OpenBSD port system.
2009/10/6 Landry Breuil
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:12:34PM +0400, Alexander Bubnov wrote:
> > Hello everybody!
> >
> > Probably I am going to ask a st
On Tuesday 06 October 2009 02:32:06 Edd Barrett wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 09:47:07PM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> > Edd, can you reproduce my claim on your latest version of MPlayer?
>
> It plays the video fine here :\ Odd.
Forgive the stupid question but can you attach the port as it
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:40:40PM +0200, Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I updated Dovecot to the latest version (1.2.1), added support for
> Managesieve and removed the old cmusieve plugin (now it's the dovecot native
> sieve plugin).
>
> You must be very carefull if you want to try th
> Probably I am going to ask a stupid question but it is very interesting for
> me. Because I would like to help BSD projects.
> Why OpenBSD does not use pkgsrc of NetBSD project as default ports? I guess
> work can be faster in case port system is shared between BSD projects
> including FreeBSD. N
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:31:16PM +1100, Ian McWilliam wrote:
>
> Did you apply the patch with patch -E ?
Thanks for the hint, it compiles after patch -E. I tried it on a sparc64
machine, too. It works also on sparc64.
Thanks for you work on samba. I really need a newer samba in OpenBSD,
becaus
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:12:34PM +0400, Alexander Bubnov wrote:
> Hello everybody!
>
> Probably I am going to ask a stupid question but it is very interesting for
> me. Because I would like to help BSD projects.
> Why OpenBSD does not use pkgsrc of NetBSD project as default ports? I guess
> work
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2009/10/06 11:18, David Coppa wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> > been in a bulk build - ok?
>>
>> Is tcl now a build dependency even with the "no_tcl" flavor?
>
> Ah, yes it is, unless we ship the g
On 2009/10/06 11:18, David Coppa wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > been in a bulk build - ok?
>
> Is tcl now a build dependency even with the "no_tcl" flavor?
Ah, yes it is, unless we ship the generated files.
"SQLite does not require TCL to run, but a TCL in
Many thanks! Now it is clear.
2009/10/6 Marc Espie
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:12:34PM +0400, Alexander Bubnov wrote:
> > Hello everybody!
> >
> > Probably I am going to ask a stupid question but it is very interesting
> for
> > me. Because I would like to help BSD projects.
> > Why OpenBSD doe
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:12:34PM +0400, Alexander Bubnov wrote:
> Hello everybody!
>
> Probably I am going to ask a stupid question but it is very interesting for
> me. Because I would like to help BSD projects.
> Why OpenBSD does not use pkgsrc of NetBSD project as default ports? I guess
> work
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> been in a bulk build - ok?
Is tcl now a build dependency even with the "no_tcl" flavor?
# env FLAVOR=no_tcl make
===> sqlite3-3.6.18 depends on: libtool-* - found
===> Verifying specs: c ncurses pthread readline c
===> found c.51.1
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 12:12:34PM +0400, Alexander Bubnov wrote:
> Hello everybody!
>
> Probably I am going to ask a stupid question but it is very interesting for
> me. Because I would like to help BSD projects.
> Why OpenBSD does not use pkgsrc of NetBSD project as default ports? I guess
> work
Hello everybody!
Probably I am going to ask a stupid question but it is very interesting for
me. Because I would like to help BSD projects.
Why OpenBSD does not use pkgsrc of NetBSD project as default ports? I guess
work can be faster in case port system is shared between BSD projects
including Fr
35 matches
Mail list logo
