On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:07:48PM -0400, Daniel Dickman wrote:
> Hi Michal, couple questions on this.
> - any reason not to use 2.8.1 which was just released?
> - do you know if the shared libs issue been resolved?
When I started, only 2.8.0 was available. Now I'm working with
2.8.1 and it looks l
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
>>
>> How do I get the symbolic links generated
>> from .so. to .so?
>>
>
> What I've learned:
>
> * If my test code is right (see below), dlopen("libbat.so")
> and dlopen("/us
On 2010/03/19 11:30, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
> >
> > There are some problems with SSL checks which need configure
> >
>
> Maybe an upstream fix didn't make it into the Feb2010
> tarballs.
>
> There was a patch to buildtools/conf/Mone
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] Sicurezza delle informazioni!
[IMAGE]
Sabato 20 marzo 2010
Gentile Cliente,
Recentemente abbiamo notato uno o più tentativi di accesso al tuo conto
.. da un IP address straniero
Per favore, effettua il login per accedere al tuo account con urgenza!
[IMAGE]
Vi invieremo una
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> There are some problems with SSL checks which need configure
>
Maybe an upstream fix didn't make it into the Feb2010
tarballs.
There was a patch to buildtools/conf/MonetDB.m4 applied
to HEAD to fix issues I was having with finding ope
On 2010/03/19 10:28, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
> >
> > How do I get the symbolic links generated
> > from .so. to .so?
> >
>
> What I've learned:
>
> * If my test code is right (see below), dlopen("libbat.so")
> and dlopen("/usr/loc
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
>
> How do I get the symbolic links generated
> from .so. to .so?
>
What I've learned:
* If my test code is right (see below), dlopen("libbat.so")
and dlopen("/usr/local/lib/libbat.so.1.34") do the
same thing on OpenBSD.
* li
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:07:48PM -0400, Daniel Dickman wrote:
> - do you know if the shared libs issue been resolved?
Out of the box, 2.8.0 is not. I had a patch for 2.8.0 that *did* (or
rather, might) fix it, but then there were problems with them assuming
the linker does library chaining.
>
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 09:35:15AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2010/03/19 08:07, Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote:
> > This diff updates Dovecot to it's latest version (1.2.11).
> > Tested on amd64 with a postgresql backend.
> > You can find the diff here too:
> > http://www.raveland.org/ports/
On 2010/03/19 08:07, Pierre-Emmanuel André wrote:
> This diff updates Dovecot to it's latest version (1.2.11).
> Tested on amd64 with a postgresql backend.
> You can find the diff here too:
> http://www.raveland.org/ports/dovecot/dovecot-1.2.11-managesieve-0.11.11-sieve-0.1.15.diff
>
> Small howt
Si vous n'arrivez pas � lire correctement ce mail, cliquez ici
All�gez vos imp�ts
gr�ce � la d�fiscalisation immobili�re.
allégez vos impôts, grâce � la défiscalisation immobilière
Constituer votre capital en immobilier : Loi Scellier
Constituer votre capital en immobilier : Loi Scellier
Inv
Hi,
This diff updates Dovecot to it's latest version (1.2.11).
Tested on amd64 with a postgresql backend.
You can find the diff here too:
http://www.raveland.org/ports/dovecot/dovecot-1.2.11-managesieve-0.11.11-sieve-0.1.15.diff
Small howto to upgrade:
http://www.raveland.org/ports/dovecot/UPGRA
12 matches
Mail list logo
