Re: Porting flashrom to OpenBSD

2010-06-19 Thread Roberto Fernandez
--- Begin Message --- On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 01:42:08AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2010/06/19 02:33, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm one of the lead developers of flashrom, a GPLv2 application to > > read/write/erase flash chips on mainboards, network/storage/graphics >

[update] Geany 0.19

2010-06-19 Thread Jonathan Armani
Hi, Update geany to 0.19 (and my email address while here), tested on amd64. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/openbsd/ports/devel/geany/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.23 diff -u -p -r1.23 Makefile --- Makefile22 Dec 2009 15:

Re: Porting flashrom to OpenBSD

2010-06-19 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010/06/19 12:50, Roberto Fernandez wrote: > On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 01:42:08AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2010/06/19 02:33, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm one of the lead developers of flashrom, a GPLv2 application to > > > read/write/erase flash chips on ma

Re: UPDATE: mcabber-0.10.0

2010-06-19 Thread Markus Hennecke
Am 12.04.2010 17:17, schrieb Markus Hennecke: Updates mcabber to version 0.10.0. Did I do the LIB-DEPENDS / WANTLIB stuff right? lib-depends-check does not complain, so I guess it is right... Kind regards, Markus Hennecke Hm, I was a little off the world in the last two month... Could anyo

Re: UPDATE: mcabber-0.10.0

2010-06-19 Thread Robert
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:20:47 +0200 Markus Hennecke wrote: > Am 12.04.2010 17:17, schrieb Markus Hennecke: > > Updates mcabber to version 0.10.0. > > > > Did I do the LIB-DEPENDS / WANTLIB stuff right? lib-depends-check > > does not complain, so I guess it is right... > > > > Kind regards, > > M

update textproc/texi2html

2010-06-19 Thread Matthias Kilian
Update to 1.82. Tested on amd64 (by comparing the generated documentation before and after the texi2html update) against emulators/qemu, graphics/ffmpeg, print/lilypond, textproc/source-highlight, x11/py-Xlib. There *are* some differences for some ports (different doctype declaration, instead of

Re: [update] Geany 0.19

2010-06-19 Thread Landry Breuil
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:56:30PM +0200, Jonathan Armani wrote: > > Hi, > > Update geany to 0.19 (and my email address while here), tested on amd64. > > +PKGNAME= ${DISTNAME} Not needed. Landry

Re: [update] Geany 0.19

2010-06-19 Thread Jonathan Armani
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:38:36 +0200 Landry Breuil wrote: > On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:56:30PM +0200, Jonathan Armani wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Update geany to 0.19 (and my email address while here), tested on amd64. > > > > > +PKGNAME= ${DISTNAME} > > Not needed. > Landry > > Right, upd

[new] sysutils/collectd

2010-06-19 Thread Landry Breuil
Hi, it has been asked by some ppl, so here is it done right.. i only did flavors for pgsql/mysql/snmp. Builds and seems to collect stats here, didn't do much more testing nor graph creation here. So please test if you have real environments using it. I might add some --disable/--without configure

kde4

2010-06-19 Thread Marc Espie
One major reason (for me) for gcc4 is kde4, which was a total nightmare (read: impossible) to port with gcc3. Between DCoppa's work on cmake, and the collective work on gcc4, I'm updating the experimental ports under x11/kde4... They're still totally experimental, some apps work, some stuff doesn

Re: python 2.5: time to go?

2010-06-19 Thread Pekka Niiranen
Marco Peereboom wrote: I am talking about custom apps that you don't see. There is a lot of python code out there running on 2.5. I am not making it up; I know of several shops that do everything in 2.5. I am all for making 2.6 the default but eliminating 2.5 from the tree seems like a bad mov

update: print/fontforge

2010-06-19 Thread Matthias Kilian
Update to fontforge-20100501. Tested with lilypond on amd64. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/print/fontforge/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -p -r1.16 Makefile --- Makefile16 Jun 2010 10:13:40 - 1.1

Re: UPDATE: mcabber-0.10.0

2010-06-19 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2010/06/19 14:20, Markus Hennecke wrote: > Am 12.04.2010 17:17, schrieb Markus Hennecke: > >Updates mcabber to version 0.10.0. > > > >Did I do the LIB-DEPENDS / WANTLIB stuff right? lib-depends-check > >does not complain, so I guess it is right... > > > >Kind regards, > > Markus Hennecke > Hm,

UPDATE: Bochs 2.4.5

2010-06-19 Thread Brad
Here is an update to Bochs 2.4.5. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/emulators/bochs/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.46 diff -N -u -p Makefile --- Makefile29 Mar 2010 07:37:12 - 1.46 +++ Makefile20 Jun 2010 01