Hello Tobias,
I know you are without internet but here is an update for tig. It works
well here on amd64. I've add the tigmanual.7 because when I look for
some documentation I always start with manuals. And there is no need for
the libncursw detection hack.
Note that you need a recent -current in
Sbiancante per denti rapido!
Vuoi denti bianchi senza dover andare dal dentista?
Clicca qui per descrizione dettagliata; http://dentibianchi.visit-page.com
Sbiancante per denti istantaneo e' un marchio registrato ProWhite.
dott.ssa Daria Abbate
D&B srl
Via Larga 31
20125 Milano
Tel: +39 02
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 06:08:20AM +1000, Ian McWilliam wrote:
> "whiners who don't send diffs"
>
> Sheesh, some of us whiners used to send diffs, backport things from
> current and were generally ignored. Along came the ressurection of
> stable ports and we were still ignored.
If your diffs g
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 08:01:48PM -0500, Erick Castillo de la Garza wrote:
> Ported from cpan
http://openbsd.org/mail.html - see Netiquette, point 6, thanks
On 9/04/2011 5:46 AM, Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 07:10:10PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
Maybe when the user base or port developer base grows a lot we'll get
auto updates but I've got a sneaky feeling the developers appreciate
keeping the uninitiated to a minimum.
s/un
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 07:10:10PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> Maybe when the user base or port developer base grows a lot we'll get
> auto updates but I've got a sneaky feeling the developers appreciate
> keeping the uninitiated to a minimum.
s/unitiated/whiners who don't send diffs/
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 09:24:38PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> Diffs for xmonad dependsncies with ghc-7.0.3. Includes devel/hs-ghc-paths
> (to build the haddock package), x11/hs-X11, x11/hs-xmonad-contrib.
> x11/xmonad itself doesn't need an update (just a rebuild; do I need
> to bump it?).
Th
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 12:43:03PM -0500, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> I am in the process of updating llvm+clang from 2.8 ==> 2.9
> (maintainer is ports@).
jsg@ already has an update for this. I believe he's just checking for
broken dependencies now.
> Will some guru please find time to investigate t
Diffs for xmonad dependsncies with ghc-7.0.3. Includes devel/hs-ghc-paths
(to build the haddock package), x11/hs-X11, x11/hs-xmonad-contrib.
x11/xmonad itself doesn't need an update (just a rebuild; do I need
to bump it?).
The updates to lang/ghc and devel/haddock sent earlier are required,
of cou
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 16:47:10 +0200
Puffy BSD wrote:
> > Can you give me an example, what should be updated in -stable?
> firefox35-3.5.11 -> firefox35-3.5.18
> mozilla-firefox-3.6.8 -> mozilla-firefox-3.6.16
> samba-3.5.4 -> samba-3.5.8
> and all other software in ports with known security holes.
Hey Wen,
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 11:22:34PM +0800, wen heping wrote:
> 2011/4/8 Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse :
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 09:58:12AM +0800, wen heping wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Here's an update of devel/p5-Try-Tiny to 0.09 ,
> >> it is required by some others ports' update.
> >>
Hi,
referring to http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=129789998809077&w=2
I am in the process of updating llvm+clang from 2.8 ==> 2.9
(maintainer is ports@). Done the update on amd64 (will need some
feedback) sending as a separate email. Update can go in or not, but
clang++ C++ compiler absolutely
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:23:01PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> In general: talk to the maintainer first, if there's no response
> send mail to ports@. If it looks complicated, talk to the maintainer
> *before* starting work on the update.
>
Updating the tree also might help to avoid duplicat
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 03:18:26PM +0200, Puffy BSD wrote:
> On 8 April 2011 14:59, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Puffy BSD
> > wrote:
> to my question. I still don't know why you are not using -current.
> >>
> >> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=1302228669
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 04:47:10PM +0200, Puffy BSD wrote:
> On 8 April 2011 15:08, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Puffy BSD
> > wrote:
> >> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#PortsSecurity
> >> This is obviously wrong and might give people the false impression
In general: talk to the maintainer first, if there's no response
send mail to ports@. If it looks complicated, talk to the maintainer
*before* starting work on the update.
On 2011/04/08 23:22, wen heping wrote:
> 2011/4/8 Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse :
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 09:58:12AM +0800, w
On 2011/04/08 16:47, Puffy BSD wrote:
> On 8 April 2011 15:08, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Puffy BSD
> > wrote:
> >> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#PortsSecurity
> >> This is obviously wrong and might give people the false impression
> >> that they're up-
This is stated many times on list and elsewhere.
I will paraphrase as what I understood of OpenBSD's stance.
"we don't have enough manpower to do juggling to update old ports, if you
need latest and greatest, use current."
i perfectly understand this. sometimes it is crazy enough to update a
p
2011/4/8 Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse :
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 09:58:12AM +0800, wen heping wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here's an update of devel/p5-Try-Tiny to 0.09 ,
>> it is required by some others ports' update.
>> Tested on loongson OK.
>>
>> Comments? Ok?
>>
>> wen
>
> Hi,
>
> What di
On 8 April 2011 15:08, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Puffy BSD wrote:
>> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#PortsSecurity
>> This is obviously wrong and might give people the false impression
>> that they're up-to-date and secure if they're tracking -stable ports
Hi,
Want to try hotot [0]? Here is a port with its dependence {py-,}keybinder.
There is no release for hotot atm so I've mirrored the last hg checkout.
If you plan to commit it, can you mirror the archive? I'm not sure I
want to maintain this port.
I've a question though. Is it needed to add a "
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Remi Pointel wrote:
> Le ven 08/04/11 14:13, "David Coppa" dco...@gmail.com a écrit:
>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:17 PM, David Coppa
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Here's an update to redis-2.2.4.
>> >
>> > Comments? OKs?
>>
>> I'm sorry, but here's an updated dif
On 8 April 2011 14:59, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Puffy BSD wrote:
to my question. I still don't know why you are not using -current.
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=130222866905500&w=2
>
> So your point here is, you need stable OS with latest packag
Ported from cpan
p5-Catalyst-View-Email.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Ported from cpan
p5-Hash-Merge-Simple.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Ported from cpan
p5-Getopt-Usaginator.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Puffy BSD wrote:
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#PortsSecurity
> This is obviously wrong and might give people the false impression
> that they're up-to-date and secure if they're tracking -stable ports
> when in fact they're not anymore.
Are you talking a
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 09:58:12AM +0800, wen heping wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's an update of devel/p5-Try-Tiny to 0.09 ,
> it is required by some others ports' update.
> Tested on loongson OK.
>
> Comments? Ok?
>
> wen
Hi,
What did the maintainer of this port say?
> diff -urN p5-
Le ven 08/04/11 14:13, "David Coppa" dco...@gmail.com a écrit:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:17 PM, David Coppa
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here's an update to redis-2.2.4.
> >
> > Comments? OKs?
>
> I'm sorry, but here's an updated diff: it was passing "-Os" from one
> Makefile (linenoise library)
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:17 PM, David Coppa wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here's an update to redis-2.2.4.
>
> Comments? OKs?
I'm sorry, but here's an updated diff: it was passing "-Os" from one
Makefile (linenoise library)
Ciao,
David
redis-2.2.4.diff
Description: Binary data
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:14 AM, David Coppa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm puzzled trying to update redis to its latest version (2.2.4).
>
> How to fix the following build error?
>
> redis.c: In function 'setupSignalHandlers':
> redis.c:1662: error: 'SA_NODEFER' undeclared (first use in this function)
> re
On 2011 Apr 08 (Fri) at 12:19:34 +0200 (+0200), Puffy BSD wrote:
:This was built and tested on a system installed from the official 4.8
:i386 cd with no parts of -current.
Except the compiler, Firefox, and whatever else you have installed.
As has been said many times before in this thread: if y
On 8 April 2011 00:50, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011/04/07 12:59, patrick keshishian wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Puffy BSD wrote:
>> > On 5 April 2011 14:36, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> >> On 2011/04/05 13:05, Puffy BSD wrote:
>> >>> On 5 April 2011 11:03, Stuart Henderson wrot
Hi,
Here's an update to redis-2.2.4.
Comments? OKs?
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/databases/redis/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 Makefile
--- Makefile21 Mar 2011 19:58:28 - 1.7
+++ Make
On 7 April 2011 20:59, Puffy BSD wrote:
> On 7 April 2011 20:07, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 06:16:12PM +0200, Puffy BSD wrote:
>>> On 5 April 2011 14:40, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
>>> > I'm curious. Why you just don't use current?
>>>
>>> Why is there an OpenBSD release c
Hi,
I'm puzzled trying to update redis to its latest version (2.2.4).
How to fix the following build error?
redis.c: In function 'setupSignalHandlers':
redis.c:1662: error: 'SA_NODEFER' undeclared (first use in this function)
redis.c:1662: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
Hi,
This diff updates libssh2 to 1.2.8.
Tested on i386.
Comments ? OK ?
Cheers,
benoit
libssh2.diff
Description: Binary data
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 08:07:43PM -0500, Erick Castillo de la Garza wrote:
> update
Please...send unified diffs for updates instead of attaching a tarball of the
whole port.
Also, when submitting new ports, a wee bit more explanation then 'ported from
cpan' would be welcome. Otherwise you're pre
38 matches
Mail list logo
