UPDATE: syslog-ng

2014-10-29 Thread Steven Mestdagh
below is an update to syslog-ng. tested on amd64. tests / comments / ok ? Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/sysutils/syslog-ng/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.48 diff -u -p -u -r1.48 Makefile --- Makefile29 Oct 2014 09:14

Re: update gpgme, move to gnupg2 backend

2014-10-29 Thread Stuart Henderson
pps. I forgot to mention, this went through a full bulk build.

Re: update gpgme, move to gnupg2 backend

2014-10-29 Thread Stuart Henderson
...well I thought signing that would be a nice little test, but it triggered the mail being sent as quoted-unreadable. diff is at https://pbot.rmdir.de/BlwQxqERyJ7Q05FUFctEfg if anyone has problems with the one in that mail.

update gpgme, move to gnupg2 backend

2014-10-29 Thread Stuart Henderson
This updates gpgme to a current version, it also switches to using gnupg2 rather than gnupg - it can use either, but the build infrastructure no longer has an easy way to turn off gpgsm so this seemed the path of least resistance. Any comments or anyone want to test with their favourite gpgme-usin

Re: Remove audio/aumix?

2014-10-29 Thread Christian Weisgerber
On 2014-10-29, Jonathan Armani wrote: > audio/mixer.app > audio/wmix > audio/wmmixer (maybe worth keeping for wm user, does it work ?) > audio/xmix > audio/xmmix Yes, I'm in favor of removing them all. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de

Re: missing quirks entries for ac3dec and flash

2014-10-29 Thread David Coppa
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Alexandre Ratchov wrote: > Is this the right way to handle deleted ports? > > OK? yes, looks right. > Index: Quirks.pm > === > RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/quirks/files/Quirks.pm,v > retrieving revisio

missing quirks entries for ac3dec and flash

2014-10-29 Thread Alexandre Ratchov
Is this the right way to handle deleted ports? OK? Index: Quirks.pm === RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/quirks/files/Quirks.pm,v retrieving revision 1.188 diff -u -p -r1.188 Quirks.pm --- Quirks.pm 29 Oct 2014 14:51:21 - 1.188

Re: unlink news/newsfecth? (was: Re: fix news/newsfetch on VAX)

2014-10-29 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 08:14 CET, j...@wxcvbn.org (Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas) wrote: > > I took at look at the code for possible security problems and *eeek*, > I don't think one should run that stuff. > > There's at least > > http://vuxml.freebsd.org/freebsd/76e0b133-6bfd-11d9-a5

[NEW] jpegdump

2014-10-29 Thread Marc Espie
Very stupid utility, just dumps raw jpeg info (hence the default CATEGORY of devel, in my opinion) Haven't found anything else that does it (so far), other tools are too "high level" for some tasks. jpegdump.tgz Description: jpegdump.tgz

Re: [Update] bison-3.0.2

2014-10-29 Thread Marc Espie
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 03:54:05PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > On 2014-10-28, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > m4: /usr/obj/ports/bison-3.0.2/bison-3.0.2/data/location.cc at line 332: > > regular expression error in ^(.)[ ]*(::)?([^][:]|:[^:])*: invalid > > character class. > > Tha

Re: Remove audio/aumix?

2014-10-29 Thread Alexandre Ratchov
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 08:45:29AM +0100, Jonathan Armani wrote: > Hello, > > I'm all for it, and I think this apply for all these [old] mixer : > > audio/aumix > audio/mixer.app > audio/wmix > audio/wmmixer (maybe worth keeping for wm user, does it work ?) not on my setup. > audio/xmix > audio

Re: Remove audio/aumix?

2014-10-29 Thread David Coppa
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Alexandre Ratchov wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:43:00PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote: >> Portroach tells me that a newer version of aumix is available, which >> has reminded me that I'd really prefer to remove the port. aumix >> uses libossaudio to prov

Re: Remove audio/aumix?

2014-10-29 Thread Jonathan Armani
Hello, I'm all for it, and I think this apply for all these [old] mixer : audio/aumix audio/mixer.app audio/wmix audio/wmmixer (maybe worth keeping for wm user, does it work ?) audio/xmix audio/xmmix 2014-10-28 22:43 GMT+01:00 Christian Weisgerber : > Portroach tells me that a newer version of

Re: Remove audio/aumix?

2014-10-29 Thread Alexandre Ratchov
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:43:00PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Portroach tells me that a newer version of aumix is available, which > has reminded me that I'd really prefer to remove the port. aumix > uses libossaudio to provide mixer controls. It is tied intimately > to the OSS mixer mo

unlink news/newsfecth? (was: Re: fix news/newsfetch on VAX)

2014-10-29 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
I took at look at the code for possible security problems and *eeek*, I don't think one should run that stuff. There's at least http://vuxml.freebsd.org/freebsd/76e0b133-6bfd-11d9-a5df-00065be4b5b6.html that should be fixed, but I don't think it's worth it. ok to remove it? -- jca | PGP :