On 2015-05-24 04:09, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 02:40:57AM +0200, Adam Wolk wrote:
How do I get mozjs 24?
# pkglocate libmozjs-24.so.0.0
spidermonkey-24.2.0p1:devel/spidermonkey:/usr/local/lib/libmozjs-24.so.0.0
Thanks, this got rid of libmozjs issue. It seems that it n
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 02:40:57AM +0200, Adam Wolk wrote:
> How do I get mozjs 24?
# pkglocate libmozjs-24.so.0.0
spidermonkey-24.2.0p1:devel/spidermonkey:/usr/local/lib/libmozjs-24.so.0.0
--
best regards
q#
Forgot to include ports@ in my reply
Original Message
Subject: Re: UPDATE: www/uget 1.10.4 => 2.0
Date: 2015-05-24 02:47
From: Adam Wolk
To: Brian Callahan
Reply-To: adam.w...@tintagel.pl
On 2015-05-24 02:39, Brian Callahan wrote:
On 05/23/15 20:29, Adam Wolk wrote:
On Tue,
Hi ports@
I had a funny interaction today.
While testing an update to www/uget I hit a conflict with my locally
installed gcc & some other libs.
Wanting to move forward with testing I decided to `pkg_delete -a` to
remove them all as they were installed
as dependencies for ports that I no long
On 05/23/15 20:29, Adam Wolk wrote:
> On Tue, 19 May 2015 23:24:40 -0400
> Brian Callahan wrote:
>
>>
>> On 05/07/15 17:26, Brian Callahan wrote:
>> > Hi ports --
>> >
>> > Attached is a major update for uget.
>> > Changelog is here:
>> > http://ugetdm.com/blog/3-stable/76-uget-20-is-officially-r
On Tue, 19 May 2015 23:24:40 -0400
Brian Callahan wrote:
On 05/07/15 17:26, Brian Callahan wrote:
> Hi ports --
>
> Attached is a major update for uget.
> Changelog is here:
> http://ugetdm.com/blog/3-stable/76-uget-20-is-officially-released
>
> Works well on amd64 and i386.
>
> OK?
>
> ~Brian
I'd like to add mail/mew to our ports.
It had been a port once and it had been deleted last year since it had
depended emacs21. Actually it works with many emacs versions. Also
it still polular in Japanese BSD/UNIX community and I myself is using
it heavily for my daily work. I'd like to revive
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 12:33:10PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2015/05/23 12:16, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:59:02AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > Not sure whether this is binutils-related or something else changed
> > > recently, but we are seeing some por
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 12:48:42AM +0200, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> Joerg Jung said:
> > please find below an update for x11/bgs to 0.7.1.
>
> WANTLIB needs fixing - bgs now needs libm. Otherwise OK czarkoff@.
Thanks, fixed and committed.
> --
> Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
>
> Index: Makefile
> =
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 01:24:52PM +0200, Joerg Jung wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 01:01:52PM +0200, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> > Dmitrij D. Czarkoff said:
> > > Joerg Jung said:
> > > > please find below an update for x11/bgs to 0.7.1.
> > >
> > > WANTLIB needs fixing - bgs now needs libm.
On 2015/05/23 12:16, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:59:02AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Not sure whether this is binutils-related or something else changed
> > recently, but we are seeing some ports picking up libatomic.so from
> > gcc-4.8 on i386.
> >
> > As this is t
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 01:01:52PM +0200, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> Dmitrij D. Czarkoff said:
> > Joerg Jung said:
> > > please find below an update for x11/bgs to 0.7.1.
> >
> > WANTLIB needs fixing - bgs now needs libm. Otherwise OK czarkoff@.
>
> And now HOMEPAGE should probably go.
Why,
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff said:
> Joerg Jung said:
> > please find below an update for x11/bgs to 0.7.1.
>
> WANTLIB needs fixing - bgs now needs libm. Otherwise OK czarkoff@.
And now HOMEPAGE should probably go.
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Index: Makefile
===
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:59:02AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Not sure whether this is binutils-related or something else changed
> recently, but we are seeing some ports picking up libatomic.so from
> gcc-4.8 on i386.
>
> As this is typically not listed in WANTLIB (only present in x11/ogre)
Not sure whether this is binutils-related or something else changed
recently, but we are seeing some ports picking up libatomic.so from
gcc-4.8 on i386.
As this is typically not listed in WANTLIB (only present in x11/ogre)
build often fails, and of course there will be runtime problems for
users w
15 matches
Mail list logo