Re: [UPDATE] www/liferea 1.12rc3

2017-09-20 Thread trondd
Poke. I don't want to forget this for another 6 months... On Tue, September 12, 2017 7:52 pm, trondd wrote: > Simple update to liferea from rc2 to rc3. I was hoping there would be > a final release by now, but it probably won't happen until I get this > version committed. :D > > I missed 6.1, so

update preview: print/poppler (next try)

2017-09-20 Thread Matthias Kilian
Hi, this is an update of print/poppler to 0.59, not to be committed yet, but to let people test builds against old (0.57) and new (0.59) poppler. The main change (introduced in poppler-0.58) is an improved Object API, which unfortunately is incompatible to the old one and thus breaks some stuff (

graphics/gdcm: switch c++11 and prepare for newer poppler

2017-09-20 Thread Matthias Kilian
Hi, this diff enforces C++11 and adds some patches from upstream to let gdcm build with poppler->=0.58. Tests with the (old) poppler-0.57 we still have in the ports tree are as welcome as comments and oks (U've only tested it with poppler-0.59 in my tree). Ciao, Kili Index: Makefile ===

print/texlive/base: switch to c++11 for real

2017-09-20 Thread Matthias Kilian
Hi, ~dd -stdc=c++11 to CXXFLAGS to kill a lot of warnings and (more important) give it at least a chance to survive configure with poppler->= 0.58 (the build with poppler-0.59 still fails, but that's another story I'm still working on). While here, expand "gcc" to "base-clang ports-gcc" in COMPIL

NEW: telephony/resiprocate

2017-09-20 Thread Ingo Feinerer
Hi, please find attached a port for the reSIProcate (https://www.resiprocate.org/) SIP stack with STUN/TURN server and SIP proxy/registrar server. $ cat pkg/DESCR-main The reSIProcate components, particularly the SIP stack, are in use in both commercial and open-source products. The project is de

UPDATE: Nextcloud-12.0.3

2017-09-20 Thread Gonzalo L. Rodriguez
Hello, New update for Nextcloud to 12.0.3: https://nextcloud.com/changelog/ Ok? Comments? Cheers.- -- Sending from my toaster. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/nextcloud/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -p

Re: mednafen 0.9.39.2 -> 0.9.46

2017-09-20 Thread Anthony J. Bentley
Martin Pieuchot writes: > Do you know if the games are multi-threaded? Could you run "top -H" and > "kdump -H"? top -H shows a single line for gambatte. > Could you also run a kernel compiled with the following diff and see if > something is printed in the dmesg when the program "freeze"? > > di

Re: [UPDATE] lang/python/2.7

2017-09-20 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Remi Pointel: > this is the diff to update Python 2.7 to latest release: 2.7.14. > > Could it be tested in a bulk build please? There were no problems on amd64. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de

Re: pledge iogen

2017-09-20 Thread Jan Stary
ping On Nov 09 16:09:02, h...@stare.cz wrote: > ping > > On Sep 14 19:07:48, h...@stare.cz wrote: > > On Sep 14 16:54:52, h...@stare.cz wrote: > > > Below please find a patch to pledge sysutils/iogen. > > > The "stdio rpath wpath cpath" seems obvious, > > > and the "proc" is for killing. I don't

Re: pledge gsm

2017-09-20 Thread Jan Stary
ping > On Sep 18 10:47:16, s...@spacehopper.org wrote: > > That looks better to me but I am swamped with the sqlite3 move and don't > > have time to test at the moment. > > > > > > > On Sep 14 16:50:43, h...@stare.cz wrote: > > > > On Sep 13 17:50:12, danj+o...@chown.me wrote: > > > > > And can

Re: drop opencore-amr?

2017-09-20 Thread Jan Stary
On Sep 20 15:05:01, h...@stare.cz wrote: > Below is a diff that unhooks opencore-amr from audio/Makefile > and removes the dependency from audio/sox, multimedia/imagination, > and telephony/pjsua. Please correct me where I missed something. On Sep 20 13:11:38, s...@spacehopper.org wrote: > multime

Re: drop opencore-amr?

2017-09-20 Thread Jan Stary
Below is a diff that unhooks opencore-amr from audio/Makefile and removes the dependency from audio/sox, multimedia/imagination, and telephony/pjsua. Please correct me where I missed something. (The current multimedia/imagination mentions opencore-amr in WANTLIB but not in LIB_DEPENDS - is that ri

Re: drop opencore-amr?

2017-09-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017/09/20 11:21, Jan Stary wrote: > On Sep 20 12:09:25, h...@stare.cz wrote: > > Grep'ing /usr/ports for 'opencore', these seem to be affected: > > > > * audio/opencore-amr (obviously) > > * audio/sox (handled below) > > * multimedia/imagination (cc maintainer) > > * telephony/pjsua (no ma

Re: drop opencore-amr?

2017-09-20 Thread Jan Stary
On Sep 20 12:09:25, h...@stare.cz wrote: > Grep'ing /usr/ports for 'opencore', these seem to be affected: > > * audio/opencore-amr (obviously) > * audio/sox (handled below) > * multimedia/imagination (cc maintainer) > * telephony/pjsua (no maintainer) > > These seem to _not_ be affected: > >

Re: mednafen 0.9.39.2 -> 0.9.46

2017-09-20 Thread Bryan Linton
[ I'm forwarding this email to the list, sans the kdump output which I already mailed privately. ] 2017-09-20 07:47:37, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 20/09/17(Wed) 01:02, Anthony J. Bentley wrote: > > > > Once it's frozen ktrace seems to show no output. Here's the last few > > lines if I run ktrace

Re: drop opencore-amr?

2017-09-20 Thread Jan Stary
On Sep 15 08:36:42, s...@spacehopper.org wrote: > On 2017/09/15 07:56, Jan Stary wrote: > > A new version of opencore-amr is out since January. > > Before I upgrade the port, shouldn't we rather drop it? > > > > Originaly, I added the opencore-amr port to have AMR in SoX, > > because AMR is what A

Re: mednafen 0.9.39.2 -> 0.9.46

2017-09-20 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 20/09/17(Wed) 01:02, Anthony J. Bentley wrote: > Martin Pieuchot writes: > > On 17/09/17(Sun) 17:05, Bryan Linton wrote: > > > [ CCing all potentially involved parties, because I'd rather CC > > > more people than necessary than leave out an interested party. > > > Please ignore this mail if it'

Re: mednafen 0.9.39.2 -> 0.9.46

2017-09-20 Thread Anthony J. Bentley
Martin Pieuchot writes: > On 17/09/17(Sun) 17:05, Bryan Linton wrote: > > [ CCing all potentially involved parties, because I'd rather CC > > more people than necessary than leave out an interested party. > > Please ignore this mail if it's not relevant to you. ] > > > > [...] > > > > Reverting th