On 24/04/20 13:35 +0200, Robert Nagy wrote:
> On 24/04/20 12:15 +0100, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Really bad timing but it looks like Salt master in OpenBSD will be
> > vulnerable for at least half a year more, unless someone backports
> > the fix, which is to be released next week, to
All,
I know we are in slowdown for 6.7 so I'm not asking that we push this in.
However, I'd really appreciate it if others could try my update to get us
from 1.4 to 1.6 of the Lumina Desktop Environment. I've included the diff
below and would welcome feedback:
--- snip ---
Index: Makef
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 03:43:24PM -0400, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 21:13:14 +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure what purpose minitube still has.
>
> Brian said he was using it. What's the problem with having it in the
> ports tree?
>
>
If it still works, no issue.
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 21:13:14 +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> I'm not sure what purpose minitube still has.
Brian said he was using it. What's the problem with having it in the
ports tree?
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 07:47:39PM +0200, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> Le Tue, 28 Apr 2020 19:23:31 +0200,
> Klemens Nanni a écrit :
>
> > Searching does not show any results but only a long URL where results
> > are supposed to be.
> >
> > Back when it worked for me (months, if not years ago), minit
On 2020/04/29 19:15, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 06:44:28PM +0200, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> > I propose removal of net/pop3gwd for the following reasons:
> >
> > - Website is down
> > - Not sure it's useful nowadays (who needs a POP3 proxy?)
nowadays: people who run large mail s
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 06:44:28PM +0200, Solene Rapenne wrote:
> I propose removal of net/pop3gwd for the following reasons:
>
> - Website is down
> - Not sure it's useful nowadays (who needs a POP3 proxy?)
if you need a pop3/imap/smtp proxy, just use nginx ? :)
I propose removal of net/pop3gwd for the following reasons:
- Website is down
- Not sure it's useful nowadays (who needs a POP3 proxy?)
- It's a network daemon facing the Internet, not updated since 23 years
(last release was in 1997 per the HISTORY file in sources)
pkg/DESCR
This program is a
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 08:55:40PM -0600, Thomas Frohwein wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 01:42:50PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > Builds (with a warning about assembly path not being used on aarch64
> > but not amd64) after backporting a patch
> >
> > https://github.com/KhronosGro
Charlene Wendling writes:
> Hi,
>
> RetroArch is broken in the current macppc bulk:
>
> > libretro-common/features/features_cpu.c:44:10: fatal error:
> > 'ppu_intrinsics.h' file not found
>
> The macppc fix i used with gcc is to blame. Meanwhile FreeBSD folks
> came with a better solution [0], fixi
After some deep testing of 'cutting edge' 0.3.5a I found some significant flaws
in SOCKS5 negotiation. So finally decided to port latest production version
0.2.8.
OK?
--- Makefile.oldFri Jul 12 23:48:35 2019
+++ MakefileTue Apr 28 22:45:00 2020
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
# $OpenBSD: Makefil
On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 23:31:41 -0600 (MDT)
c...@openbsd.org wrote:
Some informations that may be useful:
> http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/powerpc/2020-04-09/audio/qsynth.log
Waiting OK from maintainer:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=158806011730632&w=2
> http://build-failures.rhaalove
12 matches
Mail list logo
