On 14 March 2015 at 02:28, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 01:13:39PM -0700, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
Hello,
The commit below from 2014-09-16 must have broken the snapshot time
detection on http://ports.su/ , which must have been broken since
2014-09-21
On 23 March 2015 at 15:59, Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org wrote:
On 2015/03/23 10:14, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
May I also ask why is it necessary to remove the timestamp information
from the tar archives themselves?
To improve rsyncability.
Could you elaborate?
0. Doesn't rsync
Hello,
The commit below from 2014-09-16 must have broken the snapshot time
detection on http://ports.su/ , which must have been broken since
2014-09-21.
Is there a cross-platform way to best get it back from the package file?
I see that the timestamps are now embedded within +CONTENTS, and
both
Dear ports@,
I've noticed that some packages are missing from their respective categories.
For example:
%sqlite3 sqlports-compact
sqlite select fullpkgpath from Paths where fullpkgpath in (select value from
_Categories);
lang/erlang
lang/ghc
lang/mono
lang/node
x11/windowmaker
sqlite
Dear ports@,
I was adding the counts on the number of packages and categories for
http://ports.su/ , and during my verification phase, I've noticed
that the numbers didn't match with the total number of pages.
Investigation revealed that out of 8618 packages and 68 categories
from the
Dear ports@,
Taking on espie's dated call on doing something cool with
databases/sqlports port, and with his own initial work through
databases/ports-readmes port, I've decided to fork ports-readmes,
and create some very simple web-site to mirror the content generated
by my ports-readmes
Hi,
I've installed dovecot-2.1.8 from packages on OpenBSD 5.2 amd64, and
it doesn't seem to be working at all.
Cns# tail /var/log/maillog
Feb 3 19:13:14 Cns dovecot: master: Error: service(dns_client):
pipe() failed: Too many open files
Feb 3 19:13:14 Cns dovecot: master: Error:
On 15/07/2008, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wouldn't oppose having both versions in tree
I agree; one other reason to keep multiple versions of each
web-browser is so that web-developers could easily test their pages in
multiple browsers, ensuring compatibility across rendering
On 15/07/2008, Martynas Venckus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the best way to handle this was suggested by pval, a while
ago. Import it (www/mozilla-firefox3, or www/mozilla-firefox-devel),
but not link to the builds yet.
When we decide it's stable enough, reimport as
: sm_sensor.c,v 1.7 2005/10/18 19:58:11 dijkstra Exp $ */
/*
* Copyright (c) 2001-2005 Willem Dijkstra
+ * Copyright (c) 2006/2007 Constantine A. Murenin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* All rights reserved.
*
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
* modification
10 matches
Mail list logo
