Re: (no) fun with print/ghostscript/gnu

2011-07-04 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 11:56:17PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote: > > Yeah I think you can set things like: > > FULLPKGNAME-cups = ghostscript-cup-${VERSION} > > FULLPKGPATH-cups = print/ghostscript/gnu,-cups > > Cool, thanks. > > Here's my current udpate: Next try... simpler than before (no subp

Re: (no) fun with print/ghostscript/gnu

2011-07-02 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011, Matthias Kilian wrote: > > I'll do so, but it will have to wait until thursday, because I'll > > be mostly afk tomorrow. > > After splitting ghostscript into -main and -cups, there are some > problems: > > - the three FLAVORS (a4, gtk, no_x11) don't make any sense for the >

Re: (no) fun with print/ghostscript/gnu

2011-07-02 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 01:21:59AM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote: > > > 2. If I put the new gstoraster program into a subpackage, depending on > > >cups and ghostscript (-main), would this be a problem? > > > > On the contrary, I think it would be a perfectly fine solution. > > I'll do so, but

Re: (no) fun with print/ghostscript/gnu

2011-06-28 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 01:08:38AM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > 1. I forgot which ports where involved in the circular dependencies > >(it wasn't a direct cups <-> ghostscript tie); does anyone remember? > > IIRC cups used to run_depends on foomatic-filters (which depends on gs). > That

Re: (no) fun with print/ghostscript/gnu

2011-06-28 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 04:02:30PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote: > > 2. If I put the new gstoraster program into a subpackage, depending on ^ > >   cups and ghostscript (-main), would this be a problem? > > ughh... I really would like n

Re: (no) fun with print/ghostscript/gnu

2011-06-28 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > 1. I forgot which ports where involved in the circular dependencies > >(it wasn't a direct cups <-> ghostscript tie); does anyone remember? > > IIRC cups used to run_depends on foomatic-filters (which depends on gs). > That is not the case any

Re: (no) fun with print/ghostscript/gnu

2011-06-28 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, Matthias Kilian wrote: > Hi, > > i'm working on an update to ghostscript-9.02 (kind of emergency > update, because ajacoutot@ wants to print some google maps, which > currently causes ghostscript to segfault when called from pdf2ps). > > The good news: ghostscript-9.02 fixes

Re: (no) fun with print/ghostscript/gnu

2011-06-28 Thread patrick keshishian
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, patrick keshishian wrote: > >> > 2. If I put the new gstoraster program into a subpackage, depending on >> >   cups and ghostscript (-main), would this be a problem? >> >> ughh... I really would like not to have to ins

Re: (no) fun with print/ghostscript/gnu

2011-06-28 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, patrick keshishian wrote: > > 2. If I put the new gstoraster program into a subpackage, depending on > >   cups and ghostscript (-main), would this be a problem? > > ughh... I really would like not to have to install cups on any of my > systems (realizing my vote usually does

Re: (no) fun with print/ghostscript/gnu

2011-06-28 Thread patrick keshishian
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Matthias Kilian wrote: > Hi, > > i'm working on an update to ghostscript-9.02 (kind of emergency > update, because ajacoutot@ wants to print some google maps, which > currently causes ghostscript to segfault when called from pdf2ps). > > The good news: ghostscript-

(no) fun with print/ghostscript/gnu

2011-06-28 Thread Matthias Kilian
Hi, i'm working on an update to ghostscript-9.02 (kind of emergency update, because ajacoutot@ wants to print some google maps, which currently causes ghostscript to segfault when called from pdf2ps). The good news: ghostscript-9.02 fixes the problem. The bad news: the pstoraster shell script is