On 2015/06/02 01:10, Adam Wolk wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2015 09:12:15 +0100
Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org wrote:
On 2015/05/22 21:19, Adam Wolk wrote:
Hi ports@,
$ cat
govet/pkg/DESCR Vet examines Go source code and reports suspicious
constructs, such as Printf calls whose
Adam Wolk said:
Tested on amd64 -current snapshot from May 20. The package is based
on devel/gocover.
I believe it should be called go-vet, not govet. The actual tool is
called vet, and the go prefix denotes that it is installed to
subdirectory of ${LOCALBASE}/go instead of ${LOCALBASE}/bin.
On Tue, 26 May 2015 09:12:15 +0100
Stuart Henderson st...@openbsd.org wrote:
On 2015/05/22 21:19, Adam Wolk wrote:
Hi ports@,
$ cat
govet/pkg/DESCR Vet examines Go source code and reports suspicious
constructs, such as Printf calls whose arguments do not align with
the format
On 2015/05/22 21:19, Adam Wolk wrote:
Hi ports@,
$ cat
govet/pkg/DESCR Vet examines Go source code and reports suspicious
constructs, such as Printf calls whose arguments do not align with the
format string.
Vet uses heuristics that do not guarantee all reports are genuine
problems, but
Hi ports@,
$ cat
govet/pkg/DESCR Vet examines Go source code and reports suspicious
constructs, such as Printf calls whose arguments do not align with the
format string.
Vet uses heuristics that do not guarantee all reports are genuine
problems, but it can find errors not caught by the
