Re: [new] mail/aerc - terminal email client

2022-05-11 Thread Omar Polo
"James Cook" wrote: > On Mon May 2, 2022 at 12:25 AM UTC, James Cook wrote: > > > It's based on a previous submission by Raymond (+cc). I've enabled the > > > notmuch support (but not really tried it yet) and updated it, plus some > > > other minor tweaks. > > > > It is working for me with

Re: [new] mail/aerc - terminal email client

2022-05-08 Thread James Cook
On Mon May 2, 2022 at 12:25 AM UTC, James Cook wrote: > > It's based on a previous submission by Raymond (+cc). I've enabled the > > notmuch support (but not really tried it yet) and updated it, plus some > > other minor tweaks. > > It is working for me with notmuch. I'm sending this with your

Re: [new] mail/aerc - terminal email client

2022-05-04 Thread Omar Polo
Omar Polo wrote: > "James Cook" wrote: > > > It's based on a previous submission by Raymond (+cc). I've enabled the > > > notmuch support (but not really tried it yet) and updated it, plus some > > > other minor tweaks. > > > > It is working for me with notmuch. I'm sending this with your aerc

Re: [new] mail/aerc - terminal email client

2022-05-04 Thread Omar Polo
"James Cook" wrote: > > It's based on a previous submission by Raymond (+cc). I've enabled the > > notmuch support (but not really tried it yet) and updated it, plus some > > other minor tweaks. > > It is working for me with notmuch. I'm sending this with your aerc port. > This is my first time

Re: [new] mail/aerc - terminal email client

2022-05-01 Thread James Cook
> It's based on a previous submission by Raymond (+cc). I've enabled the > notmuch support (but not really tried it yet) and updated it, plus some > other minor tweaks. It is working for me with notmuch. I'm sending this with your aerc port. This is my first time using aerc. Thanks for porting

[new] mail/aerc - terminal email client

2022-04-24 Thread Omar Polo
Hello ports, Please find attached a tarball for aerc, a terminal email client: % pkg_info aerc Information for inst:aerc-0.9.0 Comment: terminal email client Description: Aerc is a terminal email client with IMAP and Maildir support. Features include asynchronous IMAP and IMAP IDLE support, a

Re: [NEW] mail/aerc 0.4.0

2020-07-31 Thread Raymond E. Pasco
On Fri Jul 31, 2020 at 7:28 AM EDT, Raymond E. Pasco wrote: > This diff should fix WRKDIST and enable go ports to be patched again. And, dependent on that diff, the attached port replaces go-libvterm with a properly dynamic-linking go-libvterm, and depends on devel/libvterm from ports.

Re: [NEW] mail/aerc 0.4.0

2020-07-31 Thread Raymond E. Pasco
This diff should fix WRKDIST and enable go ports to be patched again. diff --git a/lang/go/go.port.mk b/lang/go/go.port.mk index 0d254934f32..32a367a29bb 100644 --- a/lang/go/go.port.mk +++ b/lang/go/go.port.mk @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ MODGO_SETUP_WORKSPACE = mkdir -p ${WRKSRC:H}; mv

Re: [NEW] mail/aerc 0.4.0

2020-07-30 Thread Raymond E. Pasco
On Thu Jul 30, 2020 at 12:35 AM EDT, Raymond E. Pasco wrote: > - The previous time around, with a vendor directory, I was able to patch > the go-libvterm module to link against devel/libvterm instead of > bringing along its own libvterm. I am no longer quite sure how to do > this with the newer Go

[NEW] mail/aerc 0.4.0

2020-07-30 Thread Raymond E. Pasco
With the arrival of the new Go ports tools, I wanted to try mail/aerc again. Here's my attempt. Notes: - Because upstream uses git tags like 0.4.0 instead of v0.4.0, proxy.golang.org relegates him to v0.0.0-longsuffix hell instead of letting him use real versions. I have no opinion on this

Re: [NEW] mail/aerc

2020-03-30 Thread Raymond E. Pasco
On Mon Mar 30, 2020 at 3:48 PM, Omar Polo wrote: > There's only one thing that I would like to report, as I think it's > an error. In the default config, in the filters section, there are > some paths that I don't expect: > > > subject,~^\[PATCH=awk -f >

Re: [NEW] mail/aerc

2020-03-30 Thread Omar Polo
On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 03:29:25AM -0500, Raymond E. Pasco wrote: > - I used a modified distfile provided by abieber with a vendor directory, > which is necessary due to the large number of go package dependencies. > > - The custom version of go-libvterm used by aerc upstream includes an >

Re: [NEW] mail/aerc

2020-02-20 Thread Joerg Jung
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 09:10:15AM -0700, Aaron Bieber wrote: > On Sat, 01 Feb 2020 at 03:29:25 -0500, Raymond E. Pasco wrote: > > - I used a modified distfile provided by abieber with a vendor directory, > > which is necessary due to the large number of go package dependencies. > > > > - The

Re: [NEW] mail/aerc

2020-02-16 Thread Raymond E. Pasco
Whoops, last message bounced from the list due to a bug in the very email client in question (although it went through to Aaron). Grabbed a patch from their list to address this for now, attached; the diff to go.port.mk is also reproduced below. diff --git a/lang/go/go.port.mk

Re: [NEW] mail/aerc

2020-02-12 Thread Aaron Bieber
On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 22:26:24 -0500, Raymond E. Pasco wrote: > On Mon Feb 10, 2020 at 9:10 AM, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > It looks good to me. I'd like to pass in MODGO_FLAGS so we can have > > verbose > > info when DEBUG is set. Something like: > > MAKE_ENV += GOFLAGS="${MODGO_FLAGS}" > > > > > >

Re: [NEW] mail/aerc

2020-02-10 Thread Aaron Bieber
On Sat, 01 Feb 2020 at 03:29:25 -0500, Raymond E. Pasco wrote: > - I used a modified distfile provided by abieber with a vendor directory, > which is necessary due to the large number of go package dependencies. > > - The custom version of go-libvterm used by aerc upstream includes an >

Re: [NEW] mail/aerc

2020-02-09 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020/02/08 23:39, Joerg Jung wrote: > On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 03:29:25AM -0500, Raymond E. Pasco wrote: > > - I used a modified distfile provided by abieber with a vendor directory, > > which is necessary due to the large number of go package dependencies. > > IMHO, bundling things defeats

Re: [NEW] mail/aerc

2020-02-08 Thread Joerg Jung
On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 03:29:25AM -0500, Raymond E. Pasco wrote: > - I used a modified distfile provided by abieber with a vendor directory, > which is necessary due to the large number of go package dependencies. IMHO, bundling things defeats the purpose of ports/package system. What do you

[NEW] mail/aerc

2020-02-01 Thread Raymond E. Pasco
- I used a modified distfile provided by abieber with a vendor directory, which is necessary due to the large number of go package dependencies. - The custom version of go-libvterm used by aerc upstream includes an (unmodified) bundled copy of libvterm itself, which causes issues with the