Re: [NEW] textproc/scdoc

2020-01-25 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020/01/24 00:19, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Hi, > > Stuart Henderson wrote on Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 11:26:12AM +: > > On 2020/01/22 23:34, Raymond E. Pasco wrote: > > >> Having looked at it a bit more, I see other statically linked ports with > >> empty WANTLIB (e.g. shells/tcsh), but that

Re: [NEW] textproc/scdoc

2020-01-24 Thread Raymond E. Pasco
I would bet most people interested in this are interested in the aerc mail program (https://aerc-mail.org). (I am.)

Re: [NEW] textproc/scdoc

2020-01-24 Thread Raymond E. Pasco
Thanks for the assistance.

Re: [NEW] textproc/scdoc

2020-01-24 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi, Jan Stary wrote on Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 01:34:54PM +0100: > On Jan 24 00:19:40, schwa...@usta.de wrote: >> Obviously, this is only yet another low-quality man(7) generator >> (emitting pointless low-level roff(7) code, lots of bogus .P, >> incorrectly encoded dashes, using low-level font

Re: [NEW] textproc/scdoc

2020-01-24 Thread Jan Stary
On Jan 24 00:19:40, schwa...@usta.de wrote: > Obviously, this is only yet another low-quality man(7) generator > (emitting pointless low-level roff(7) code, lots of bogus .P, > incorrectly encoded dashes, using low-level font escapes rather > than proper man(7) macros, failing to properly generate

Re: [NEW] textproc/scdoc

2020-01-23 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi, Stuart Henderson wrote on Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 11:26:12AM +: > On 2020/01/22 23:34, Raymond E. Pasco wrote: >> Having looked at it a bit more, I see other statically linked ports with >> empty WANTLIB (e.g. shells/tcsh), but that doesn't necessarily mean it's >> correct. Since I don't

Re: [NEW] textproc/scdoc

2020-01-23 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020/01/22 23:34, Raymond E. Pasco wrote: > Having looked at it a bit more, I see other statically linked ports with > empty WANTLIB (e.g. shells/tcsh), but that doesn't necessarily mean it's > correct. Since I don't know, here's another tgz identical to the last > but with WANTLIB=c (which, if

Re: [NEW] textproc/scdoc

2020-01-22 Thread Raymond E. Pasco
Having looked at it a bit more, I see other statically linked ports with empty WANTLIB (e.g. shells/tcsh), but that doesn't necessarily mean it's correct. Since I don't know, here's another tgz identical to the last but with WANTLIB=c (which, if you remove -static, is what it would require).

Re: [NEW] textproc/scdoc

2020-01-22 Thread Raymond E. Pasco
> I _think_ it needs WANTLIB, bit I am not 100% sure on that. Once that's > sorted, OK abieber@ for import! I'm not sure when a port would or wouldn't WANTLIB=c, but lib-depends-check thinks it's superfluous here. > Side-note: If you are looking to import aerc, I have a wip of that as > well:

Re: [NEW] textproc/scdoc

2020-01-21 Thread Aaron Bieber
On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 23:35:18 -0500, Raymond E. Pasco wrote: > This is a simple man page generation language. > > The only patch is to some tests, which failed because of errors in > the tests themselves rather than program errors. > > I'm not experienced at OpenBSD ports; feedback is

[NEW] textproc/scdoc

2020-01-19 Thread Raymond E. Pasco
This is a simple man page generation language. The only patch is to some tests, which failed because of errors in the tests themselves rather than program errors. I'm not experienced at OpenBSD ports; feedback is appreciated. scdoc.tgz Description: GNU Zip compressed data